IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v212y2018icp60-67.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rabies response, One Health and more-than-human considerations in Indigenous communities in northern Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Degeling, Chris
  • Brookes, Victoria
  • Lea, Tess
  • Ward, Michael

Abstract

Australia is currently canine rabies free; however, the spread of rabies in eastern Indonesia poses an increasing risk to northern Australia. Domestic dogs are numerous in East Arnhem Land (EAL) and the Northern Peninsular Area (NPA), usually unrestrained and living in close relationships with humans. The response to any rabies outbreak on Australian territory will focus on dog vaccination, controlling dog movements and depopulation. A One Health approach to zoonotic disease control should seek to co-promote human and animal health, whilst also seeking to accommodate the preferences of affected communities. We report on 5 collaborative workshops and 28 semi-structured interviews conducted between January 2017 and June 2018 with: (i) EAL and NPA community members; (ii) Indigenous Rangers in EAL and NPA; and (iii) residents of Cairns, the local regional centre. Storyboard methodologies were used to work with participants and explore what rabies response measures they thought were justified or unacceptable, why they held these views, and what other steps they believed needed to be taken. Key findings include that the capacity of the NPA and EAL communities to contribute/adapt to a biosecurity response is limited by structural disadvantage including poor infrastructure (such as lockable premises and intact fences) and appropriate information, dominant cultural norms and food security concerns. Dogs and dingoes can have great cultural and social importance; key interventions might be accommodated within cultural beliefs and long-standing norms of dog management if sufficient effort is made to adapt interventions to local contexts and community preferences. Adopting such a ‘strengths-based’ approach mandates that the communities at greatest risk need help to prepare for and develop strategies to manage a biosecurity response to a rabies incursion. This would include listening to individual and community concerns and attending to the educational and infrastructural needs for supporting different groups to respond appropriately.

Suggested Citation

  • Degeling, Chris & Brookes, Victoria & Lea, Tess & Ward, Michael, 2018. "Rabies response, One Health and more-than-human considerations in Indigenous communities in northern Australia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 60-67.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:212:y:2018:i:c:p:60-67
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.07.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953618303629
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.07.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brookes, Victoria J. & Degeling, Chris & Ward, Michael P., 2018. "Going viral in PNG – Exploring routes and circumstances of entry of a rabies-infected dog into Papua New Guinea," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 10-18.
    2. Rock, Melanie J. & Rault, Dawn & Degeling, Chris, 2017. "Dog-bites, rabies and One Health: Towards improved coordination in research, policy and practice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 126-133.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maylis Layan & Simon Dellicour & Guy Baele & Simon Cauchemez & Hervé Bourhy, 2021. "Mathematical modelling and phylodynamics for the study of dog rabies dynamics and control: A scoping review," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-24, May.
    2. Krithika Srinivasan & Tim Kurz & Pradeep Kuttuva & Chris Pearson, 2019. "Reorienting rabies research and practice: Lessons from India," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Tamara Riley & Neil E. Anderson & Raymond Lovett & Anna Meredith & Bonny Cumming & Joanne Thandrayen, 2021. "One Health in Indigenous Communities: A Critical Review of the Evidence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-12, October.
    4. Tamara Riley & Bonny Cumming & Joanne Thandrayen & Anna Meredith & Neil E. Anderson & Raymond Lovett, 2023. "One Health and Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Communities: A One Health Pilot Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(14), pages 1-16, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Krithika Srinivasan & Tim Kurz & Pradeep Kuttuva & Chris Pearson, 2019. "Reorienting rabies research and practice: Lessons from India," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Phirabhat Saengsawang & Kannika Na Lampang & Warangkhana Chaisowwong, 2017. "The Concordance of Perception about Dog Bite Impacts and Practices after Dog Bite in Victims, Chiang Mai, Thailand: The Participatory One-Health Disease Detection (PODD) Project Setting Area," International Journal of Health and Medical Sciences, Mohammad A. H. Khan, vol. 3(3), pages 67-74.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:212:y:2018:i:c:p:60-67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.