IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v20y1985i9p911-921.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The role of the receptionist in general practice: A 'dragon behind the desk'?

Author

Listed:
  • Arber, Sara
  • Sawyer, Lucianne

Abstract

The power and influence of receptionists in general practice has been the subject of little research. We argue that the structural position of receptionists and the nature of primary medical care give receptionists a potential discretionary role in determining access to the general practitioner. A major criterion for access is the imputed urgency of the patient's condition, which frequently involves the receptionist making a medical assessment based on only a brief verbal exchange. The paper draws on interviews with a sample of over 1000 adults about their experiences of the reception process in general practice. The receptionist's role in the following areas is examined; delay in obtaining appointments, asking the reason for surgery consultations and home visits, reducing the number of home visits by suggesting patients attend the surgery, putting patients through to speak to the doctor on the telephone and giving health advice. Patients who have experienced receptionists as an active intermediary are more likely to report interaction difficulties with receptionists. The survey data lend support to two major findings: (1) that as practices become larger and more complex receptionists operate with more rigid rules, leading to greater hostility expressed by patients towards reception staff; and (2) parents with dependent children and young adults express more antagonism, because they are more likely to experience the receptionist as a 'gatekeeper' with whom they need to negotiate to see a doctor for acute care for themselves or for their children.

Suggested Citation

  • Arber, Sara & Sawyer, Lucianne, 1985. "The role of the receptionist in general practice: A 'dragon behind the desk'?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 20(9), pages 911-921, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:20:y:1985:i:9:p:911-921
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(85)90347-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Neuwelt, Pat M. & Kearns, Robin A. & Browne, Annette J., 2015. "The place of receptionists in access to primary care: Challenges in the space between community and consultation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 287-295.
    2. Smith, Sarah A., 2016. "Migrant encounters in the clinic: Bureaucratic, biomedical, and community influences on patient interactions with front-line workers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 49-56.
    3. Vredenburg, Jessica & Bell, Simon J., 2014. "Variability in health care services: the role of service employee flexibility," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 168-178.
    4. Grant, Suzanne & Guthrie, Bruce, 2018. "Between demarcation and discretion: The medical-administrative boundary as a locus of safety in high-volume organisational routines," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 43-50.
    5. Ward, Jenna & McMurray, Robert, 2011. "The unspoken work of general practitioner receptionists: A re-examination of emotion management in primary care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(10), pages 1583-1587, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:20:y:1985:i:9:p:911-921. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.