IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v20y1985i10p969-979.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Computers and clinical judgement: The role of physician networks

Author

Listed:
  • Anderson, James G.
  • Jay, Stephen J.

Abstract

In order to study the relationship between physician networks and utilization of a computer-based hospital information system (HIS), blockmodel analysis and multidimensional scaling were used to analyze and spatially represent the network of professional relations among 24 physicians in a private group practice. A blockmodel analysis of patient referrals, consultations, discussions, and on-call coverage identified four groups of physicians who share common locations and perform similar roles within the network. Investigation of the shared attributes of these groups supports this relational structure. The results suggest that the center-periphery model of diffusion of new ideas among professionals may be too simplistic. Instead, the communication network may involve multiple central cohesive subgroups of physicians who differentially initiate patient referrals and consultations with physicians in other subgroups. Network location was found to have a significant effect on the adoption and utilization of the HIS independently of background and practice characteristics of physicians. The results also suggest that adoption of an innovation and its implementation or utilization may involve separate processes that need to be differentiated in future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Anderson, James G. & Jay, Stephen J., 1985. "Computers and clinical judgement: The role of physician networks," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 20(10), pages 969-979, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:20:y:1985:i:10:p:969-979
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(85)90253-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hubbard, Susan M. & Huang, Judy Y. & Mulvey, Kevin P., 2003. "Application of diffusion of innovations theory to the TIPs evaluation project results and beyond," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 99-107, February.
    2. Hubbard, Susan M. & Hayashi, Susan W., 2003. "Use of diffusion of innovations theory to drive a federal agency's program evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 49-56, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:20:y:1985:i:10:p:969-979. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.