IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v18y1984i9p737-744.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The patient's view

Author

Listed:
  • Armstrong, David

Abstract

Deference to the importance of the patient's view has recently become a major feature of much medical practice and social science research. This paper, however, argues that attempts to establish the authentic version of what the patient says is misplaced as investigation can only reveal what is heard, not what is said. The changes in perception which enable some things to be heard, and not others, are traced through medicine and the social sciences during the last 50 years and it is suggested that recent interest in the validity of the patient's view are no more than artefacts of these changes in perception.

Suggested Citation

  • Armstrong, David, 1984. "The patient's view," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 18(9), pages 737-744, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:18:y:1984:i:9:p:737-744
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(84)90099-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Borgstrom, Erica & Walter, Tony, 2015. "Choice and compassion at the end of life: A critical analysis of recent English policy discourse," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 136, pages 99-105.
    2. Henckes, Nicolas, 2009. "Narratives of change and reform processes: Global and local transactions in French psychiatric hospital reform after the Second World War," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 511-518, February.
    3. Alyson Callan & Roland Littlewood, 1998. "Patient Satisfaction: Ethnic Origin or Explanatory Model?," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 44(1), pages 1-11, March.
    4. Seale, Clive & Chaplin, Robert & Lelliott, Paul & Quirk, Alan, 2006. "Sharing decisions in consultations involving anti-psychotic medication: A qualitative study of psychiatrists' experiences," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(11), pages 2861-2873, June.
    5. Pflueger, Dane, 2016. "Knowing patients: The customer survey and the changing margins of accounting in healthcare," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 17-33.
    6. Arribas-Ayllon, Michael, 2016. "After geneticization," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 132-139.
    7. Fillion, Emmanuelle, 2008. "Clinical relationships tested by iatrogenicity: The case of haemophiliac patients faced with the epidemic of transfusional AIDS," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(9), pages 1400-1409, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:18:y:1984:i:9:p:737-744. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.