IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v18y1984i7p561-569.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Women and medicalisation: An empirical examination of the extent of women's dependence on medical technology in the early detection of breast cancer

Author

Listed:
  • Calnan, Michael

Abstract

Recent criticisms of the thesis of medicalisation focusing at the level of doctor-patient interaction have suggested that patient dependency on or addiction to modern scientific medicine and in particular medical scientific technology is overstated. However, empirical research to examine this is difficult to find. The study presented here throws some light on this issue as it looks at women's beliefs and feelings about breast screening and breast self-examination and the prospect of attending for breast screening or a class which teaches BSE. The results show that the generalised concept of patient dependence is limited although there was more support for women's dependence on medical technology than choosing to be directly responsible for identifying abnormalities themselves and managing them.

Suggested Citation

  • Calnan, Michael, 1984. "Women and medicalisation: An empirical examination of the extent of women's dependence on medical technology in the early detection of breast cancer," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 18(7), pages 561-569, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:18:y:1984:i:7:p:561-569
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(84)90071-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:18:y:1984:i:7:p:561-569. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.