IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v18y1984i4p315-321.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prediction of pregnancy complications: An application of the biopsychosocial model

Author

Listed:
  • Smilkstein, Gabriel
  • Helsper-Lucas, Annelies
  • Ashworth, Clark
  • Montano, Dan
  • Pagel, Mark

Abstract

This paper describes a pilot study of biomedical and psychosocial risk and the outcome of pregnancy. Ninety-three pregnant women completed four instruments to identify three types of psychosocial risk: life events, family function and social support. Biomedical risk was identified through analysis of self-reported health histories and hospital records. Information on complications of pregnancy was obtained from hospital delivery records. Further complications data were obtained by a home interview at 6 weeks postpartum. In the sample studied, from an agricultural-university community in Eastern Washington, biomedical risk alone was not substantially related to complications. Psychosocial risk was related to both delivery and postpartum complications. Family function was the best single psychosocial predictor. The interaction between family function and biomedical risk also predicted complications reliably. A total of 11% of variance in postpartum complications could be explained jointly by biomedical and psychosocial risk. The results of the study suggest that psychosocial risk assessment alone and in interaction with biomedical risk assessment will offer significant improvement in the identification of women who may experience pregnancy complication.

Suggested Citation

  • Smilkstein, Gabriel & Helsper-Lucas, Annelies & Ashworth, Clark & Montano, Dan & Pagel, Mark, 1984. "Prediction of pregnancy complications: An application of the biopsychosocial model," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 315-321, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:18:y:1984:i:4:p:315-321
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(84)90120-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:18:y:1984:i:4:p:315-321. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.