IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v18y1984i3p273-278.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Medical misinformation: Communication between outport Newfoundland women and their physicians

Author

Listed:
  • Davis, Dona Lee

Abstract

A middle-aged woman in a Newfoundland outport fishing village visits the doctor at a local medical clinic and complains of a case of bad nerves. Because he neither adequately understands the subtleties of the village concept of nerves nor the local etiquette of disease disclosure, the physician misinterprets the women's complaint and treats her for an ailment she does not have. The incident discourages the woman and other villagers from seeking medical care in the future. Any outport doctor should be familiar with the character of nerves as effectors of temperment, as conversation capital, and as female status enhancers and also with the role that 'women the worrier' plays in the local fishery. Features of village life which the physician, in this case study, fails to understand include: the complex patterns of social interaction behind the woman's decision to seek medical aid, the outporter's reluctance to ask for help or become obligated to others, and the local fear of persons in positions of authority. Most importantly the doctor is ignorant of the local view of the physician as a kind of moral adjudicator with the power to undermine the patient's reputation as a good woman in the community.

Suggested Citation

  • Davis, Dona Lee, 1984. "Medical misinformation: Communication between outport Newfoundland women and their physicians," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 273-278, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:18:y:1984:i:3:p:273-278
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(84)90090-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:18:y:1984:i:3:p:273-278. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.