IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v18y1984i12p1089-1093.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychological side-effects of the mass screening on cervical cancer

Author

Listed:
  • Reelick, N. F.
  • de Haes, W. F. M.
  • Schuurman, J. H.

Abstract

The results are reported of a study on the psychological side-effects of mass screening for cervical cancer in Rotterdam. The reactions of participants towards a positive smear and towards the treatment which followed the positive smear were analysed. Women who had problems with a positive smear and with a serious disorder which necessitated an operation and hospitalization had problems with the treatment. However, most women who underwent the operation did not have lasting problems of either a psychological or somatic nature. Women who had been treated by their G.P.s or by a gynaecologist in most cases did not have problems with their treatment. The final conclusion was that mass screening for cervical cancer in Rotterdam caused psychological side-effects to occur among women with a positive smear. However, for the majority of women with a positive smear they were not of a lasting or serious nature.

Suggested Citation

  • Reelick, N. F. & de Haes, W. F. M. & Schuurman, J. H., 1984. "Psychological side-effects of the mass screening on cervical cancer," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 18(12), pages 1089-1093, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:18:y:1984:i:12:p:1089-1093
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(84)90169-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Blomberg, Karin & Forss, Anette & Ternestedt, Britt-Marie & Tishelman, Carol, 2009. "From 'silent' to 'heard': Professional mediation, manipulation and women's experiences of their body after an abnormal Pap smear," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 479-486, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:18:y:1984:i:12:p:1089-1093. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.