IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v18y1984i10p827-837.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lay consulation of older people

Author

Listed:
  • Furstenberg, Anne Linda
  • Davis, Linda J.

Abstract

The study of lay consultation has drawn attention to how social interaction supports, validates and influences the perception and response to health problems. Until now, such research has not considered how the particular circumstances of older people alter the process, i.e. (1) disruption of support networks, (2) experience of chronic rather than acute illness and (3) suffering of diseases shared by a sizable proportion of their agemates. Using case study data, the authors show how everyday discussions of health problems lead to the transmission to the sufferer of new information about the health condition, the reinforcement of health actions and in some cases attempts to persuade or to intervene actively. The authors use the case study material to identify variables shaping the process of consultation and suggest the importance of this process in the adaptation of older people to declining health.

Suggested Citation

  • Furstenberg, Anne Linda & Davis, Linda J., 1984. "Lay consulation of older people," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 18(10), pages 827-837, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:18:y:1984:i:10:p:827-837
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(84)90150-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:18:y:1984:i:10:p:827-837. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.