IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v17y1983i24p1995-2002.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Planning priorities and health care delivery in Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Abudu, Folorunso

Abstract

Economic development had grave as well as beneficial effects on the health of a nation. While it might enhance health standards through better prevention, diagnosis and treatment of diseases, it could endanger health via new eating habits and a tempo of life not conducive to healthy living. These effects of development necessitate rational health planning, the main ingredients of which are manpower planning, physical planning to ensure an even and equitable distribution of medical facilities between urban and rural localities, measures to integrate traditional and orthodox medical practices and financial planning to ensure an adequate allocation of funds to the health sector. In spite of official declarations of intentions to effect a comprehensive health coverage for Nigeria, financial allocation and planning priorities have failed to reflect this. Planned capital expenditure for the health sector has consistently hovered around the 2% mark, only attaining 4.6% in the second development plan, 1970-1974. This low priority accorded the health sector manifests itself in inadequate medical manpower, facilities and coverage of the population by modern medical services. Meeting the health needs of the Nigerian population requires a substantial financial allocation, the integration of modern and traditional medical practices and the reorganisastion and improved management of medical facilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Abudu, Folorunso, 1983. "Planning priorities and health care delivery in Nigeria," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 17(24), pages 1995-2002, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:17:y:1983:i:24:p:1995-2002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(83)90139-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:17:y:1983:i:24:p:1995-2002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.