Planning and politics of resource allocation for primary health care: Promotion of meaningful national policy

Securing resources for primary health care (PHC) involves consideration of the entire health sector: the higher levels of the health service as well as the primary level, and the private and/or social security sub-sectors as well as the government service. Reshaping resource distribution is less a redistribution of existing resources than the allocation of new resources in accordance with PHC priorities. In this the planning of future current costs is a crucial element and requires a budgetary system that identifies expenditures by geographical area and level of care. Resources should be allocated geographically to reduce health care inequalities through the provision of an appropriate mix of different levels of care. Central resource planning and local health care programming (with 'dialogue' between the two) should be the basic planning division of labour, which largely resolves the so-called topdown /bottom-up dichotomy. The private medical sub-sector exerts economic, ideological and political influences on the public health service. Compulsory health insurance schemes can have some similar effects. Success of a PHC policy requires that governments adopt a holistic approach to the health sector. The allocation of health care resources on the bases of need and equity, as opposed to demand, is a political decision. The establishment of a national PHC policy backed up by adequate resources involves a specific politico-technical exercise with four components: research, planning, policy formulation, and government policy decision-making. The resource planning method, based on social epidemiology, is contrasted with conventional health planning methods, based on epidemiology. The articulation of these two approaches is discussed in terms of WHO's Managerial Process for National Health Development. Examples are quoted from Zimbabwe.