IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v17y1983i1p17-23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Participation in faecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer

Author

Listed:
  • Dent, Owen F.
  • Bartrop, Roger
  • Goulston, Kerry J.
  • Chapuis, Pierre H.

Abstract

Chemical faecal occult blood testing has been proposed as a means of screening for colorectal cancer (C.C.) in populations or in identified high-risk groups. The level of public participation is a critical factor in the effectiveness of screening programmes. This study was conducted as a methodological pretest for an intended investigation of factors influencing screening participation. Faecal occult blood screening was offered to 728 employees of a teaching hospital in Sydney, New South Wales and 41% participation was obtained. Both participants and non-participants were questioned on demographic and social background factors, on their experience of C.C. in others, and on their reasons for participating or not participating. Major reasons for participation were: a general feeling of the importance of health checks and screening tests; a belief that it is important to diagnose C.C. early; and the fact that the test was simple and easy to do. Prominent self-acknowledged reasons for non-participation were indifference, procrastination, absence of previous bowel complaints, preference for one's own doctor to do such tests and inconvinience or lack of time. Those more likely to participate were: females; those of Australian or British origin; single, separated or divorced persons; those having two or more dependents and those with personal knowledge of a C.C. patient.

Suggested Citation

  • Dent, Owen F. & Bartrop, Roger & Goulston, Kerry J. & Chapuis, Pierre H., 1983. "Participation in faecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 17-23, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:17:y:1983:i:1:p:17-23
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(83)90074-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elyès Jouini & Clotilde Napp, 2018. "The Impact of Health-Related Emotions on Belief Formation and Behavior," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 84(3), pages 405-427, May.
    2. Chapple, Alison & Ziebland, Sue & Hewitson, Paul & McPherson, Ann, 2008. "What affects the uptake of screening for bowel cancer using a faecal occult blood test (FOBt): A qualitative study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(12), pages 2425-2435, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:17:y:1983:i:1:p:17-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.