IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v17y1983i19p1463-1466.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

PHC in Bangladesh--Too much to ask?

Author

Listed:
  • Islam, Kamal
  • Bachman, Sally

Abstract

In Bangladesh where the number of those without land is increasing; 30% of the budget (national) goes for 'maintaining law and order'; there is massive illiteracy; the common people and, more specifically, women, are not involved in decision-making. It is unrealistic to think that PHC has a chance to survive or succeed. Should Government (with all good intentions) try to run a PHC while socio-economic and political factors remain unchanged, it (PHC) will not succeed. Its fate is either a collision, in which PHC will be the victim, or a compromise of some type. In most Third World countries, it is a compromised PHC that one sees. In spite of this, we still believe that community-oriented health care can help to bring about social, economic and political changes, provided such changes are accompanied by structural reform in the political economy of the country.

Suggested Citation

  • Islam, Kamal & Bachman, Sally, 1983. "PHC in Bangladesh--Too much to ask?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 17(19), pages 1463-1466, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:17:y:1983:i:19:p:1463-1466
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(83)90044-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:17:y:1983:i:19:p:1463-1466. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.