IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v17y1983i15p1027-1041.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-disciplinary perspectives on post-partum depression: An anthropological critique

Author

Listed:
  • Stern, Gwen
  • Kruckman, Laurence

Abstract

One negative outcome of the post-partum period is the occurrence of post-partum depression. While the incidence levels are high in the U.S. for the 'Blues' and the 'moderate level depression disorder', the nature of this phenomenon--as a disease and as an illness--remains unclear. It is suggested that an anthropological perspective incorporating symbolic behavior and biological processes may more effectively address the problem than isolated biological and psycho-social research. Theories of etiology based strictly in biological mechanisms have resulted in a treatment bias towards pharmocological intervention; this paper suggests that more attention should be given to the imapact of the cultural patterning of the post-partum period, e.g. the structure, organization of the family group and role expectations. A review of the anthropological literature on childbirth provides little evidence for post-partum depression. Our own observations and an examination of the cross-cultural literature have identified common elements in the social structuring of the post-partum period. They include: (1) cultural patterning of a distinct post-partum period; (2) protective measures designed to reflect the vulnerability of the new mother; (3) social seclusion; (4) mandated rest; (5) assistance in tasks from relatives and/or midwife; (6) social recognition of new social status through rituals, gifts or other means. A hypothesis is proposed that a relationship exists between post-partum social organization/mobilization and post-partum depression. The experience of 'depression' in the U.S. may represent a culture bound syndrome resulting from the lack of social structuring of the post-partum events, social recognition of the role transition for the new mother and instrumental support and aid for the new mother.

Suggested Citation

  • Stern, Gwen & Kruckman, Laurence, 1983. "Multi-disciplinary perspectives on post-partum depression: An anthropological critique," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 17(15), pages 1027-1041, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:17:y:1983:i:15:p:1027-1041
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(83)90408-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eleri Jones & Ernestina Coast, 2013. "Social relationships and postpartum depression in South Asia: A systematic review," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 59(7), pages 690-700, November.
    2. Hanlon, Charlotte & Whitley, Rob & Wondimagegn, Dawit & Alem, Atalay & Prince, Martin, 2009. "Postnatal mental distress in relation to the sociocultural practices of childbirth: An exploratory qualitative study from Ethiopia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 1211-1219, October.
    3. Jaya Jambunathan, 1995. "Hmong Cultural Practices and Beliefs," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 4(3), pages 335-345, August.
    4. Ariana M. Albanese & Pamela A. Geller & Jackson M. Steinkamp & Jennifer L. Barkin, 2020. "In Their Own Words: A Qualitative Investigation of the Factors Influencing Maternal Postpartum Functioning in the United States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-28, August.
    5. Honjo, Kaori & Kimura, Takashi & Baba, Sachiko & Ikehara, Satoyo & Kitano, Naomi & Sato, Takuyo & Iso, Hiroyasu, 2018. "Association between family members and risk of postpartum depression in Japan: Does “who they live with” matter? -The Japan environment and Children's study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 65-72.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:17:y:1983:i:15:p:1027-1041. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.