IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v17y1983i13p861-869.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The feasibility of economic evaluation of diagnostic procedures

Author

Listed:
  • Wagner, Judith L.

Abstract

This paper reviews the principles of cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis as they are applied to diagnostic procedures. These medical procedures present particularly thorny problems to those who would subject them to economic evaluation. Five specific problem areas encountered in attempting to apply economic evaluation to diagnostic procedures are discussed in detail. They are: defining homogeneous patient groups for analysis; specifying the relevant diagnostic alternatives; measuring diagnostic accuracy; measuring diagnostic costs; and specifying the measured outcomes of the diagnostic process. The economic evaluation literature on two diagnostic procedures--the skull X-ray and computed tomographic (CT) scanning is reviewed within the context of a model of economic evaluation. Two studies were found to successfully apply the principles of economic evaluation to CT scanning; none were found for skull X-rays. The most common approaches to evaluating the usefulness of these procedures, and the limitations of these approaches, are summarized.

Suggested Citation

  • Wagner, Judith L., 1983. "The feasibility of economic evaluation of diagnostic procedures," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 17(13), pages 861-869, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:17:y:1983:i:13:p:861-869
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(83)90275-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:17:y:1983:i:13:p:861-869. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.