IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v17y1983i10p647-655.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk groups and selective case finding in an elderly population

Author

Listed:
  • Ford, Graeme
  • Taylor, Rex

Abstract

As the preventive approach gains ground in the care of the elderly there is increasing interest in screening or case-finding. Given the impracticability of visiting all those over a certain age, most GPs and health visitors concentrate on those considered to be at greatest risk of medical and social deterioration. This paper draws on data from a random sample of the elderly population of Aberdeen to examine the nature and extent of 'risk' experienced by those falling into a number of conventionally defined risk groups. It shows that few of these groups are comprehensively disadvantaged and most are inefficient for selective case-finding. An alternative approach based on answers to a carefully selected set of screening questions is shown to be more efficient, and suggestions are offered for further improvements.

Suggested Citation

  • Ford, Graeme & Taylor, Rex, 1983. "Risk groups and selective case finding in an elderly population," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 17(10), pages 647-655, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:17:y:1983:i:10:p:647-655
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(83)90371-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:17:y:1983:i:10:p:647-655. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.