IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v16y1982i19p1699-1704.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How perceptions of a simulated physician-patient interaction influence intended satisfaction and compliance

Author

Listed:
  • Willson, Pamela
  • McNamara, J. Regis

Abstract

A frequent problem encountered in the evaluation of medical services is that patients inter-twine or confound perceptions of technical medical skills (competence) with those of interpersonal and communication skills (courtesy). The present study investigated the extent to which competence and courtesy influenced enacted patient perceptions of medical care; as well as how those perceptions related to satisfaction and compliance with the care delivered. Small groups of undergraduates viewed one of four videotapes on which were depicted a physician-patient interaction for a sore throat problem. Differential levels of competence and courtesy were displayed in the various tapes. While watching the videotape, subjects were asked to assume the role of the sore throat patient. Factor analysis of semantic differential items administered subsequent to the videotapes revealed the presence of two strong and distinct clusters, one labeled courtesy and the other competence. Univariate ANOVAs indicated that the courtesy manipulation influenced the perception of courtesy and general medical satisfaction, while the competence manipulation influenced not only perceived competence but perceived courtesy, general medical satisfaction, and compliance as well. Subjects were able to accurately discriminate the extremes of good and poor physician behavior. The limitations of the study as well as its implications for developing better understanding of how perceptions of health care providers are formed were explored.

Suggested Citation

  • Willson, Pamela & McNamara, J. Regis, 1982. "How perceptions of a simulated physician-patient interaction influence intended satisfaction and compliance," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 16(19), pages 1699-1704, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:16:y:1982:i:19:p:1699-1704
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(82)90095-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. McQuilken, Lisa, 2010. "The influence of failure severity and employee effort on service recovery in a service guarantee context," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 214-221.
    2. Didem Gamze Isiksal & Elif Karaosmanoglu, 0. "Can self-referencing exacerbate punishing behavior toward corporate brand transgressors?," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 0, pages 1-16.
    3. Sparks, Beverley A. & McColl-Kennedy, Janet R., 2001. "Justice strategy options for increased customer satisfaction in a services recovery setting," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 209-218, December.
    4. Didem Gamze Isiksal & Elif Karaosmanoglu, 2020. "Can self-referencing exacerbate punishing behavior toward corporate brand transgressors?," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(6), pages 629-644, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:16:y:1982:i:19:p:1699-1704. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.