IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v16y1982i15p1429-1448.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Human experimentation in historical and ethical perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Howard-Jones, Norman

Abstract

During the past two decades there has been an extraordinary proliferation of articles, books, reports, laws and regulations, and meetings concerned with the ethical aspects of biomedical interventions on human beings and, in particular, those of an experimental nature. Such writings, the vast majority of which are in the English language, necessarily tend to become more and more repetitive in the sense that they bring to light no new facts, or even ideas, but are variations on the same themes according to the cultural and professional backgrounds of their authors. For some of the older problems of medical ethics, particularly those linked to human reproduction-- such as induced abortion, sterilization, and artificial insemination from a donor--it would be illusory to expect a consensus at the national, far less the international, level, for religious dogma or deeply-felt personal convictions may render discussion sterile. However, for the increasingly important subject of biomedical experimentation involving human subjects it might well be possible to arrive at an international consensus, as has already been done in very broad terms by the World Medical Association in the Tokyo (1975) revision of the Declaration of Helsinki (Helsinki II). It was in the belief that a more comprehensive consensus might be achieved that the World Health Organization and the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences embarked in 1978 on a joint project for the establishment of international ethical guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects, taking Helsinki II as their starting point. In some of the existing literature on bioethics there are brief historical introductions, but these are usually very rudimentary. It was therefore decided that, in order to place the WHO/CIOMS project in the broadest possible perspective, an attempt should be made to provide a further, if not comprehensive, account of the historical aspects of human experimentation and of the circumtances in which formal ethical codes evolved.

Suggested Citation

  • Howard-Jones, Norman, 1982. "Human experimentation in historical and ethical perspectives," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 16(15), pages 1429-1448, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:16:y:1982:i:15:p:1429-1448
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(82)90139-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yilmaz, Gaye & Erdogan, Diyar, 2019. "Anatomy of a refugee workshop: Syrian labourers in Istanbul," GLU Working Papers 56, Global Labour University (GLU).
    2. Barry Bozeman & Paul Hirsch, 2005. "Science ethics as a bureaucratic problem: IRBs, Rules, and Failures of control," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 38(4), pages 269-291, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:16:y:1982:i:15:p:1429-1448. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.