IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v16y1982i12p1179-1196.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on psychotropic drug use : A review of findings and methods

Author

Listed:
  • Cooperstock, Ruth
  • Parnell, Penny

Abstract

Studies of licit psychotropic drugs, utilizing a variety of methodologies, which have been conducted in the United States, Australia, Canada and Europe (including the United Kingdon) are examined to describe the prevalence and patterns of use of these drugs. While not directly comparable, consistent patterns emerge both nationally and internationally, with notably higher use recorded among women and the elderly, and where identifiable, minor tranquillizers generally being the most commonly prescribed psychotropic. The necessity of moving beyond the level of quantitative data analysis in order to provide insights into the processes influencing current drug-prescribing and consumption practices is pointed out. Recommendations are made for future research directions which would address questions of the potential social and public health consequences of drug consumption, matters of particular interest to policy makers. The various methods employed in psychotropic drug use studies are described and evaluated in terms of their advantages and disadvantages and their appropriateness for future investigations utilizing this public health approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Cooperstock, Ruth & Parnell, Penny, 1982. "Research on psychotropic drug use : A review of findings and methods," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 16(12), pages 1179-1196, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:16:y:1982:i:12:p:1179-1196
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(82)90143-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hasan, Hamid & Ejaz, Nauman, 2013. "Testing for Differences across Genders: A Replication of Ultimatum Game at International Islamic University, Islamabad," MPRA Paper 44923, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Collin, Johanne & Otero, Marcelo, 2015. "Resistance and mutations of non-specificity in the field of anxiety-depressive disorders in Canadian medical journals, 1950–1990," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 228-238.
    3. A.H. Ghodse & B. Baigent & T.C. Evans & S. Anderson, 1987. "The Use of a Drug Utilisation Index To Monitor Psychotropic Drug Use in Hospitals," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 33(1), pages 21-28, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:16:y:1982:i:12:p:1179-1196. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.