IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v16y1982i10p1079-1091.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of patients' perceptions of high blood pressure on attendance at screening : An extension of the health belief model

Author

Listed:
  • King, Jennifer B.

Abstract

This study is concerned with a neglected area: the synthesis of two approaches relevant to health-related behaviour--the Health Belief Model and Attribution Theory. A prospective design was used to test the combination of health beliefs and causal attributions that predispose patients to attend a screening for raised blood pressure. It was proposed that causal attributions concerning high blood pressure (HBP) would (i) affect other health beliefs, (ii) would act in conjunction with health beliefs in relation to actual behaviour and (iii) might show, in some cases, a more direct influence on behaviour and behavioural intention. One hundred and three adults responded to the questionnaire. Multivariate analyses were used to discriminate between the characteristics of attenders and non-attenders. The general prediction was confirmed: overall, eight factors comparing both HBM and attributional items produced a highly significant discrimination. A correlational analysis revealed a variety of linear relationships between HBM-items and causal attributions. Much of the variance in attendance was accounted for by the intention variable, and multiple regression analysis was performed to examine the determinants or intention, as a significant intervening factor between beliefs and behaviour. Participation bias limits the generalisability of these findings. The potential significance of causal attributions as predictors of both health beliefs and behaviour is nevertheless apparent. The implications of such a synthesis of approaches are discussed in terms of psychological theory and health education.

Suggested Citation

  • King, Jennifer B., 1982. "The impact of patients' perceptions of high blood pressure on attendance at screening : An extension of the health belief model," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 16(10), pages 1079-1091, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:16:y:1982:i:10:p:1079-1091
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(82)90184-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Geunsik Kim & Seoyong Kim & Eunjung Hwang, 2021. "Searching for Evidence-Based Public Policy and Practice: Analysis of the Determinants of Personal/Public Adaptation and Mitigation Behavior against Particulate Matter by Focusing on the Roles of Risk ," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-22, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:16:y:1982:i:10:p:1079-1091. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.