IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v16y1982i10p1054-1059.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Selective primary health care: Is efficient sufficient?

Author

Listed:
  • Berman, Peter A.

Abstract

Developing countries are increasingly using economic evaluation methods to assess and plan their health services. Inappropriate application of these methods may lead to serious errors in developing primary health care strategies. In 'Selective Primary Health Care', Julia Walsh and Kenneth Warren present a logical approach to health planning based on cost-effectiveness techniques. Their paper is a timely example of the risks of using simple technical criteria to plan solutions to complex public health problems. Cost-effectiveness is not a sufficient criterion for planning primary health care. Related issues are discussed in these comments. As an alternative, a multiple-objective approach is suggested.

Suggested Citation

  • Berman, Peter A., 1982. "Selective primary health care: Is efficient sufficient?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 16(10), pages 1054-1059, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:16:y:1982:i:10:p:1054-1059
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(82)90178-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fox-Rushby, Julia A. & Foord, Frances, 1996. "Costs, effects and cost-effectiveness analysis of a mobile maternal health care service in West Kiang, The Gambia," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 123-143, February.
    2. Flessa, Steffen, 2003. "Priorities and allocation of health care resources in developing countries: A case-study from the Mtwara region, Tanzania," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(1), pages 67-80, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:16:y:1982:i:10:p:1054-1059. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.