IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v135y2015icp1-14.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the use of social network analysis to measure communication between disease programme and district managers at sub-national level in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Kawonga, Mary
  • Blaauw, Duane
  • Fonn, Sharon

Abstract

With increasing interest in maximising synergies between disease control programmes (DCP) and general health services (GHS), methods are needed to measure interactions between DCP and GHS actors. In South Africa, administrative integration reforms make GHS managers at decentralised level (district managers) responsible for the oversight of DCP operations within districts, with DCP managers (programme managers) providing specialist support. The reforms necessitate interdependence, but these actors work together ineffectively. Communication is crucial for joint working, but no research to assess communication between these actors has been done. This study explores the use of social network analysis (SNA) to measure the extent to which programme and district managers in South Africa communicate, using HIV monitoring and evaluation (M&E) as an exemplar. Data were collected from fifty one managers in two provinces during 2010–2011, to measure: a) one-on-one task-related communication – talking about the collation (verification, reporting) and use of HIV data for monitoring HIV interventions; and b) group communication through co-participating in management committees where HIV data are used for monitoring HIV interventions in districts. SNA measures were computed to describe actor centrality, network density (cohesion), and communication within and between respective manager groups. Block modelling was applied to identify management committees that connect respective manager groups. Results show HIV programme managers located at higher level communicated largely amongst themselves as a group (homophily), seldom talked to the district managers to whom they are supposed to provide specialist HIV M&E support, and rarely participated with them in management committees. This research demonstrates the utility of SNA as a tool for measuring the extent of communication between DCP and GHS actors at sub-national level. Actions are needed to bridge observed communication gaps in order to promote collaborative monitoring of HIV programme interventions within districts.

Suggested Citation

  • Kawonga, Mary & Blaauw, Duane & Fonn, Sharon, 2015. "Exploring the use of social network analysis to measure communication between disease programme and district managers at sub-national level in South Africa," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 1-14.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:135:y:2015:i:c:p:1-14
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.04.024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953615002531
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.04.024?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bruno Marchal & Anna Cavalli & Guy Kegels, 2009. "Global Health Actors Claim To Support Health System Strengthening—Is This Reality or Rhetoric?," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(4), pages 1-5, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Colin D Butler, 2019. "Philanthrocapitalism: Promoting Global Health but Failing Planetary Health," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Echica van Kelle & Sarah I. Spronk & Denis Kibira & Carolien J. Aantjes, 2023. "Rethinking the donor's role in strengthening health systems through sexual and reproductive health and rights partnerships: A qualitative analysis of Ugandan case studies," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(7), pages 1711-1730, October.
    3. Fabiana da Cunha Saddi & Stephen Peckham & Gerald Bloom & Nick Turnbull & Vera Schattan Coelho & Jean-Louis Denis, 2023. "Employing the policy capacity framework for health system strengthening," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 42(1), pages 1-13.
    4. Anna Cavalli & Sory I Bamba & Mamadou N Traore & Marleen Boelaert & Youssouf Coulibaly & Katja Polman & Marjan Pirard & Monique Van Dormael, 2010. "Interactions between Global Health Initiatives and Country Health Systems: The Case of a Neglected Tropical Diseases Control Program in Mali," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(8), pages 1-7, August.
    5. Ahmed, Haitham M. & Mitchell, Marc & Hedt, Bethany, 2010. "National implementation of Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI): Policy constraints and strategies," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 128-133, July.
    6. Peter Amico & Christian Aran & Carlos Avila, 2010. "HIV Spending as a Share of Total Health Expenditure: An Analysis of Regional Variation in a Multi-Country Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(9), pages 1-8, September.
    7. Maria Paola Bertone & Natasha Palmer & Krista Kruja & Sophie Witter & HSSEC Working Group 1, 2023. "How do we design and evaluate health system strengthening? Collaborative development of a set of health system process goals," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 279-288, March.
    8. Sophie Witter & Natasha Palmer & Dina Balabanova & Sandra Mounier‐Jack & Tim Martineau & Anna Klicpera & Charity Jensen & Miguel Pugliese‐Garcia & Lucy Gilson, 2019. "Health system strengthening—Reflections on its meaning, assessment, and our state of knowledge," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 1980-1989, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:135:y:2015:i:c:p:1-14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.