IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceps/v98y2025ics0038012125000096.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

ANP/GCR-based SWOT method for making group strategic decisions with consensus reaching

Author

Listed:
  • Du, Yuan-Wei
  • Sun, Ya-Lu
  • Chen, Qun

Abstract

The Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) analysis serves as an effective strategic tool for identifying both internal and external factors influencing an organization. However, traditional SWOT analysis tends to be highly subjective and often overlooks critical aspects such as the dynamics of decision-making groups, dependencies among influencing factors, uncertainties in the decision-making environment, and conflicting opinions within groups. To address these limitations, we propose a method that integrates the Analytic Network Process/Generalized Combination Rule (ANP/GCR)-based SWOT method for making group strategic decisions with consensus reaching. Initially, decision information is extracted based on the knowledge structure of expert group members. Subsequently, this group information is synthesized using the GCR; this synthesis considers the importance of each expert's input and the reliability of their respective decision information. Following this step, a consensusreaching model is employed to derive decision information that meets experts' satisfaction levels. Finally, we utilize the ANP method to identify optimal strategic alternatives. The effectiveness of our proposed approach is illustrated through a case study focused on strategic decision-making for enhancing ecological practices in marine ranching, and its validity is further supported by comparative analyses.

Suggested Citation

  • Du, Yuan-Wei & Sun, Ya-Lu & Chen, Qun, 2025. "ANP/GCR-based SWOT method for making group strategic decisions with consensus reaching," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:98:y:2025:i:c:s0038012125000096
    DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2025.102160
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012125000096
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.seps.2025.102160?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:98:y:2025:i:c:s0038012125000096. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/seps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.