IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceps/v82y2022ipas0038012122000118.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A locational analysis of deregulation policies in the Spanish retail pharmaceutical sector

Author

Listed:
  • Bruno, Giuseppe
  • Cavola, Manuel
  • Diglio, Antonio
  • Elizalde, Javier
  • Piccolo, Carmela

Abstract

The retail pharmaceutical sector has been characterized in the last decades by profound deregulation policies, aiming at fostering the entry process of new competitors in the market to improve users' access and quality of services. This paper explores the effects of such reforms in the Navarre Region (Spain), where the existing entry restrictions were relaxed in 2000. Using a GIS-based methodology and very disaggregated real data, we show that the massive entry of new pharmacies improved users' access in urban and rural areas but led to intense agglomeration of competitors within limited distances, thus failing to result in a more fair spatial competition. We then propose solving a mathematical programming model that can support policy-makers for an ex-ante assessment of the (spatial) effects determined by changing regulatory frameworks. Results from our computational experiments demonstrate that, if adequately oriented at guaranteeing predefined minimum profitability to new entrants, spatial deregulation policies may result in win-win scenarios for both users and pharmacies. Indeed, the obtained solutions (almost) perfectly replicate the current accessibility conditions while ensuring more equitable market shares’ distribution.

Suggested Citation

  • Bruno, Giuseppe & Cavola, Manuel & Diglio, Antonio & Elizalde, Javier & Piccolo, Carmela, 2022. "A locational analysis of deregulation policies in the Spanish retail pharmaceutical sector," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PA).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:82:y:2022:i:pa:s0038012122000118
    DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2022.101233
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012122000118
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.seps.2022.101233?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vogler, Sabine & Habimana, Katharina & Arts, Danielle, 2014. "Does deregulation in community pharmacy impact accessibility of medicines, quality of pharmacy services and costs? Evidence from nine European countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(3), pages 311-327.
    2. Yang, Nan & Shen, Liyin & Shu, Tianheng & Liao, Shiju & Peng, Yi & Wang, Jinhuan, 2021. "An integrative method for analyzing spatial accessibility in the hierarchical diagnosis and treatment system in China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    3. Anell, Anders, 2005. "Deregulating the pharmacy market: the case of Iceland and Norway," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 9-17, December.
    4. Carreras, Miquel & Serra, Daniel, 1999. "On optimal location with threshold requirements," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 91-103, June.
    5. Oded Berman & Zvi Drezner & Arie Tamir & George Wesolowsky, 2009. "Optimal location with equitable loads," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 167(1), pages 307-325, March.
    6. Bruno, Giuseppe & Cavola, Manuel & Diglio, Antonio & Piccolo, Carmela & Pipicelli, Eduardo, 2021. "Strategies to reduce postal network access points: from demographic to spatial distribution criteria," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    7. Xiao, Yixiong & Chen, Xiang & Li, Qiang & Jia, Pengfei & Li, Luning & Chen, Zhifen, 2021. "Towards healthy China 2030: Modeling health care accessibility with patient referral," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    8. Barbarisi, Ilaria & Bruno, Giuseppe & Diglio, Antonio & Elizalde, Javier & Piccolo, Carmela, 2019. "A spatial analysis to evaluate the impact of deregulation policies in the pharmacy sector: Evidence from the case of Navarre," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(11), pages 1108-1115.
    9. Neutens, Tijs, 2015. "Accessibility, equity and health care: review and research directions for transport geographers," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 14-27.
    10. Gallone, Emma Luisa & Ravetto Enri, Lorenzo & Pignata, Irene & Baratta, Francesca & Brusa, Paola, 2020. "The 2017 deregulation of pharmacies in Italy: Introducing non-pharmacist ownership," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(12), pages 1281-1286.
    11. Rudholm, Niklas, 2008. "Entry of new pharmacies in the deregulated Norwegian pharmaceuticals market--Consequences for costs and availability," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 258-263, August.
    12. Bruno, Giuseppe & Cavola, Manuel & Diglio, Antonio & Piccolo, Carmela, 2020. "Improving spatial accessibility to regional health systems through facility capacity management," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barbarisi, Ilaria & Bruno, Giuseppe & Diglio, Antonio & Elizalde, Javier & Piccolo, Carmela, 2019. "A spatial analysis to evaluate the impact of deregulation policies in the pharmacy sector: Evidence from the case of Navarre," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(11), pages 1108-1115.
    2. Gallone, Emma Luisa & Ravetto Enri, Lorenzo & Pignata, Irene & Baratta, Francesca & Brusa, Paola, 2020. "The 2017 deregulation of pharmacies in Italy: Introducing non-pharmacist ownership," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(12), pages 1281-1286.
    3. Bruno, Giuseppe & Cavola, Manuel & Diglio, Antonio & Piccolo, Carmela & Pipicelli, Eduardo, 2021. "Strategies to reduce postal network access points: from demographic to spatial distribution criteria," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    4. Håkonsen, Helle & Sundell, Karolina Andersson & Martinsson, Johan & Hedenrud, Tove, 2016. "Consumer preferences for over-the-counter drug retailers in the reregulated Swedish pharmacy market," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(3), pages 327-333.
    5. Jo, Wooyong & Nam, Hyoryung & Choi, Jeonghye, 2022. "Opening the OTC drug market: The effect of deregulation on retail pharmacy’s performance," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 847-866.
    6. Ana Moura & Pedro Pita Barros, 2020. "Entry and price competition in the over‐the‐counter drug market after deregulation: Evidence from Portugal," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(8), pages 865-877, August.
    7. Moura, Ana, 2021. "Essays in health economics," Other publications TiSEM c93abd22-fa4a-42a5-b172-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    8. Li, Chuanyao & Wang, Junren, 2022. "A hierarchical two-step floating catchment area analysis for high-tier hospital accessibility in an urban agglomeration region," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    9. Giuseppe Bruno & Manuel Cavola & Antonio Diglio & Carmela Piccolo, 2022. "Geographical accessibility to upper secondary education: an Italian regional case study," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 69(2), pages 511-536, October.
    10. Wei, Zhongyu & Bai, Jianjun & Feng, Ruitao, 2023. "Optimization referral rate design for hierarchical diagnosis and treatment system based on accessibility-utilization efficiency bi-objective collaboration: A case study of China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    11. Vogler, Sabine & Habimana, Katharina & Arts, Danielle, 2014. "Does deregulation in community pharmacy impact accessibility of medicines, quality of pharmacy services and costs? Evidence from nine European countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(3), pages 311-327.
    12. G. Arbia & V. Nardelli & N. Salvini & I. Valentini, 2024. "New accessibility measures based on unconventional big data sources," Papers 2401.13370, arXiv.org.
    13. Andrea Cintolesi & Andrea Riganti, 2022. "Liberalizing the opening of new pharmacies and hospitalizations," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 1388, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    14. Guhl, Dennis & Stargardt, Tom & Schneider, Udo & Fischer, Katharina E., 2016. "Dispensing behaviour of pharmacies in prescription drug markets," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(2), pages 190-197.
    15. Xu, Jing & Murray, Alan T. & Church, Richard L. & Wei, Ran, 2023. "Service allocation equity in location coverage analytics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(1), pages 21-37.
    16. Bruno, Giuseppe & Cavola, Manuel & Diglio, Antonio & Piccolo, Carmela, 2020. "Improving spatial accessibility to regional health systems through facility capacity management," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    17. Kališ, Richard, 2024. "From symbiosis to independence: Investigating changes in the relationship between general practitioners’ presence and pharmacies’ market size in Slovakia," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    18. Mirosław Krzyśko & Waldemar Wołyńki & Marcin Szymkowiak & Andrzej Wojtyła, 2021. "A Spatio-Temporal Analysis of the Health Situation in Poland Based on Functional Discriminant Coordinates," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-17, January.
    19. Martins, Lurdes & Queirós, Sónia, 2015. "Competition among pharmacies and the typology of services delivered: The Portuguese case," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(5), pages 640-647.
    20. Håkonsen, Helle & Horn, Anne Marie & Toverud, Else-Lydia, 2009. "Price control as a strategy for pharmaceutical cost containment--What has been achieved in Norway in the period 1994-2004?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(2-3), pages 277-285, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:82:y:2022:i:pa:s0038012122000118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/seps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.