IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/scaman/v6y1990i1p45-59.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the process and content of strategy in different organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Romme, Georges
  • Kunst, Paul
  • Schreuder, Hein
  • Spangenberg, John

Abstract

This paper deals with a quantitative assessment of strategy content and strategy process characteristics. The framework used is based on the concept of strategic logics. The empirical study involves six organizations in The Netherlands. Both the content and the process dimension of strategy-making are measured by means of questionnaires, administered in an interview. Qualitative observations were made in order to cross-validate the quantitative measures obtained by the questionnaire. Finally, we discuss some problems and the major implications of this study.

Suggested Citation

  • Romme, Georges & Kunst, Paul & Schreuder, Hein & Spangenberg, John, 1990. "Assessing the process and content of strategy in different organizations," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 45-59.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:scaman:v:6:y:1990:i:1:p:45-59
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/095652219090042F
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. A. Romme, 1995. "Boolean comparative analysis of qualitative data," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 317-329, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:scaman:v:6:y:1990:i:1:p:45-59. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/872/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.