IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reveco/v99y2025ics1059056025002151.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of recycling and emission reduction models under carbon taxes and government subsidies

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Yuan
  • Jia, Zhao
  • Qin, Chuan
  • Li, Zhaoqi
  • Ying, Jinhuika

Abstract

This study constructs a recycling and emission reduction model where a third party is responsible for recycling, and the manufacturer is responsible for remanufacturing. We compare three scenarios: no government subsidy, government subsidies to recyclers for recycling volumes, and government subsidies to manufacturers for emission reductions. The results show that while carbon tax can effectively reduce carbon emissions, it also increases product prices and reduces market demand. In contrast, government subsidies significantly improve product recycling and reduce carbon emissions, enhancing corporate profits and government efficiency. Specifically, government subsidies are found to be more effective than carbon taxes in promoting recycling and emission reduction. The subsidy intensity is proportional to the basic recycling amount of old products and inversely proportional to the unit recycling cost and carbon tax. This study provides valuable insights for policymakers and businesses on how to design and implement effective subsidy policies to promote low-carbon supply chain management.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Yuan & Jia, Zhao & Qin, Chuan & Li, Zhaoqi & Ying, Jinhuika, 2025. "Analysis of recycling and emission reduction models under carbon taxes and government subsidies," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:99:y:2025:i:c:s1059056025002151
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2025.104052
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056025002151
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104052?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:99:y:2025:i:c:s1059056025002151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620165 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.