IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reveco/v98y2025ics1059056025001042.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The green development mechanism of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei coordinated development strategy in China: Novel evidence of green finance

Author

Listed:
  • Ma, Baolin
  • Li, Yongxin
  • Zhou, Bo
  • Jian, Yaode
  • Zhang, Cheng
  • An, Jin

Abstract

The Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH) coordinated development strategy is one of the most notable policy attempts made by the Chinese central government to achieve regional coordinated green development. Utilizing panel data of China's 30 provinces from 2000 to 2019, this paper employs the regression control method to investigate the effect and mechanism of the BTH coordinated development strategy on green development. Empirical evidence reveals that the BTH coordinated development strategy has a significant positive effect on green development in Beijing and Tianjin. However, the effect in Hebei is not statistically significant. This study further finds that green finance can explain this heterogeneity. The BTH coordinated development strategy promotes green development in Beijing and Tianjin by promoting the development of green finance, but the strategy fails to boost the development of green finance in Hebei. Thus, the strategy cannot contribute to green development in Hebei.

Suggested Citation

  • Ma, Baolin & Li, Yongxin & Zhou, Bo & Jian, Yaode & Zhang, Cheng & An, Jin, 2025. "The green development mechanism of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei coordinated development strategy in China: Novel evidence of green finance," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:98:y:2025:i:c:s1059056025001042
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2025.103941
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056025001042
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iref.2025.103941?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:98:y:2025:i:c:s1059056025001042. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620165 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.