IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reveco/v98y2025ics1059056025000085.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

ESG rating adjustment and capital market pricing efficiency: Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Ruan, Lei
  • Li, Jianing
  • Huang, Siqi

Abstract

Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings serve as an important reference for investors, enabling them to assess the fundamental information of companies and make investment decisions, thereby enhancing capital market pricing efficiency. Frequent adjustments to ESG ratings will bring incremental information to the capital market. However, the mechanism of this information affecting capital market pricing efficiency remains unclear. Therefore, this paper empirically investigates the impact of ESG rating adjustments on capital market pricing efficiency. It explores the underlying mechanisms, using Chinese A-share listed companies from 2010 to 2023 as a case study. The findings reveal a significant negative relationship between ESG rating adjustments and capital market pricing efficiency. Specifically, the greater the degree of ESG rating adjustment, the more pronounced the phenomenon of asset mispricing, leading to a reduction in capital market pricing efficiency. This conclusion holds robust after conducting a series of endogeneity and robustness tests. Mechanistic analysis suggests that ESG rating adjustments exacerbate the degree of information asymmetry and diminish analyst forecast quality, which in turn impairs asset pricing efficiency. Heterogeneity analysis further indicates that the negative impact of ESG rating adjustments on capital market pricing efficiency is more pronounced in non-state-owned firms, firms with no significant internal control deficiencies, firms operating in polluting industries, and firms located in the eastern and central regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruan, Lei & Li, Jianing & Huang, Siqi, 2025. "ESG rating adjustment and capital market pricing efficiency: Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:98:y:2025:i:c:s1059056025000085
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2025.103845
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056025000085
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iref.2025.103845?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:98:y:2025:i:c:s1059056025000085. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620165 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.