IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reveco/v96y2024ipcs1059056024007251.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Revisiting the determinants of cryptocurrency excess return: Does scarcity matter?

Author

Listed:
  • Bui, Mai
  • Pham, Huy
  • Nguyen Thanh, Binh
  • Tiwari, Aviral Kumar

Abstract

Cryptocurrencies have emerged as a new financial asset class, and the literature in this area is increasing rapidly. This study examines the determinants and proposes a new approach to capture the scarcity effect of proof-of-work cryptocurrency return. We find that the scarcity effect is one of the major determinants of excess return. Besides the scarcity effect, our results indicate that market risk premium, momentum effect, size effect, investor attention, and mining costs effect are significant determinants of proof-of-work cryptocurrency excess return. In addition, we compare the effectiveness of three mimicking portfolios: size effect, momentum effect, and scarcity effect to their background factors. The findings show that compared to their background factors, size effect and scarcity effect mimicking portfolios have better-explaining power.

Suggested Citation

  • Bui, Mai & Pham, Huy & Nguyen Thanh, Binh & Tiwari, Aviral Kumar, 2024. "Revisiting the determinants of cryptocurrency excess return: Does scarcity matter?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(PC).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:96:y:2024:i:pc:s1059056024007251
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2024.103733
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056024007251
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iref.2024.103733?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:96:y:2024:i:pc:s1059056024007251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620165 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.