IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reveco/v96y2024ipcs1059056024007184.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Greening through ESG: Do ESG ratings improve corporate environmental performance in China?

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Hua
  • Lai, Jie

Abstract

Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings matter for corporate green development as they can shape companies' sustainable efforts. However, the influence of third-party ESG ratings as an emerging informal environmental regulation on corporate environmental performance (CEP) remains understudied in China. To identify this causality, we exploit the exogenous variation of SynTao Green Finance's ESG ratings and conduct a difference-in-differences (DID) estimation. Utilizing panel data of Chinese A-share listed companies from 2008 to 2023, we find that ESG ratings can induce improvements in CEP, along with increased positive environmental scores and decreased negative environmental scores. We document three feasible mechanisms for this CEP impact: alleviated financial constraints, heightened media attention, and enhanced green innovation. We further investigate the heterogeneous effects and find that ESG ratings significantly improve CEP for companies with high executive shareholding and more female directors, companies in low-competitive industries, and those located in cities with high levels of economic development. Our findings contribute to existing studies on the determinants of CEP and offer novel evidence of the efficacy of ESG ratings as an informal institution in promoting corporate green development.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Hua & Lai, Jie, 2024. "Greening through ESG: Do ESG ratings improve corporate environmental performance in China?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(PC).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:96:y:2024:i:pc:s1059056024007184
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2024.103726
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056024007184
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iref.2024.103726?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:96:y:2024:i:pc:s1059056024007184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620165 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.