IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reveco/v96y2024ipcs105905602400707x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of institutional commitments on corporate risk-taking: Evidence from the United Nations Principles for responsible investment

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Rongxin
  • Chen, Yuhao

Abstract

Taking the institutions that signed the United Nations (UN) Principles of Responsible Investment (PRI) from 2012 to 2021 as a sample, we study whether the risk-taking of investment targets will be affected when the institutions sign the PRI. The findings demonstrate that when an institution subscribes to the PRI, it significantly decreases its investment target's degree of risk-taking. After a series of stability tests, such as surrogate variables and propensity score matching method, the main regression results in this paper remain consistent. It has been suggested through mechanism analysis that signing the PRI increases both investment efficiency and information disclosure quality thereby minimizing enterprise risk-taking behavior. Further research shows that the state-owned nature of institutions and higher media attention can reduce the risk-taking of enterprises. This paper provides a new explanatory dimension through which enterprises can reduce their level of risk-taking and offers a theoretical foundation for further expanding the impact of the PRI.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Rongxin & Chen, Yuhao, 2024. "The impact of institutional commitments on corporate risk-taking: Evidence from the United Nations Principles for responsible investment," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(PC).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:96:y:2024:i:pc:s105905602400707x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2024.103715
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105905602400707X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iref.2024.103715?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:96:y:2024:i:pc:s105905602400707x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620165 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.