IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reveco/v96y2024ipcs1059056024007020.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental supervision distance, government-enterprise collusion and corporate environmental information disclosure

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Bin
  • Ma, Yonghong
  • Luo, Beier
  • Shi, Daqian
  • Jiang, Shan

Abstract

Based on the framework of government-enterprise collusion and proactive government regulation, this study examines the impact of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulatory distance on corporate environmental information disclosure (EID) using data from listed companies in China from 2009 to 2021. The results of the study show that: (1) The closer the geographical distance between the local EPA and the company, the poorer the quality, which verifies the collusion effect. Our results are robust after a series of robustness checks. (2) The collusion effect of geographical distance primarily works by enhancing the ability of companies to seek environmental protection. (3) The impact is greater when the sample company belongs to non-sub-provincial municipal, pollution industry, state-owned, large-scale, and mature enterprises. (4) The central environmental inspections and media attention can alleviate the collusion effect of environmental regulatory distance. This study provides new empirical evidence for the " distance decay effect " in geo-economics and offers new insights from the perspective of geo-economics for measuring government-enterprise collusion.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Bin & Ma, Yonghong & Luo, Beier & Shi, Daqian & Jiang, Shan, 2024. "Environmental supervision distance, government-enterprise collusion and corporate environmental information disclosure," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(PC).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:96:y:2024:i:pc:s1059056024007020
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2024.103710
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056024007020
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iref.2024.103710?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:96:y:2024:i:pc:s1059056024007020. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620165 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.