IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reveco/v95y2024ics1059056024004659.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analyzing the influence of smart and digital manufacturing on cost stickiness: A study of U.S. manufacturing firms

Author

Listed:
  • Shahzad, Farrukh
  • Ahmad, Munir
  • Irfan, Muhammad
  • Wang, Zhenkun
  • Fareed, Zeeshan

Abstract

In the digital economy, smart and digital manufacturing has become an essential tool for firms to increase their industrial intelligence in recent years. This research uses data from U.S. manufacturing firms from 2011 to 2021 to investigate the effect of smart and digital manufacturing and its mechanism on firm cost stickiness. The findings demonstrate that the adoption of smart and digital manufacturing negatively impacts a firm's cost stickiness, suggesting that the adoption of smart and digital manufacturing has a deterrent effect on cost stickiness. Mechanism test results show that smart and digital manufacturing primarily lowers the cost stickiness of businesses by enhancing resource allocation effectiveness and improving information processing capabilities. Smart and digital manufacturing has a significantly stronger inhibitory effect on cost stickiness compared to collaborative smart and digital manufacturing modes. According to the examination of heterogeneity variables, firms with higher staff knowledge levels and non-SOE status experience a more pronounced inhibitory effect of smart and digital manufacturing on their cost stickiness. The value effect analysis indicates that smart and digital manufacturing eventually increases a company's present and future performance, enhancing long-term value by reducing cost stickiness. This study offers guidance and insights for the development of firm operational strategies and the promotion of national industrial intelligence policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Shahzad, Farrukh & Ahmad, Munir & Irfan, Muhammad & Wang, Zhenkun & Fareed, Zeeshan, 2024. "Analyzing the influence of smart and digital manufacturing on cost stickiness: A study of U.S. manufacturing firms," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:95:y:2024:i:c:s1059056024004659
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2024.103473
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056024004659
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iref.2024.103473?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark C. Anderson & Rajiv D. Banker & Surya N. Janakiraman, 2003. "Are Selling, General, and Administrative Costs “Sticky”?," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(1), pages 47-63, March.
    2. Bargoni, Augusto & Giachino, Chiara & Troise, Ciro & Alam, Gazi Mahabubul & Quaglia, Roberto, 2023. "A digital family affair: Do family firms' characteristics enhance consumers' willingness to pay?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    3. Meindl, Benjamin & Ayala, Néstor Fabián & Mendonça, Joana & Frank, Alejandro G., 2021. "The four smarts of Industry 4.0: Evolution of ten years of research and future perspectives," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    4. Clara Xiaoling Chen & Hai Lu & Theodore Sougiannis, 2012. "The Agency Problem, Corporate Governance, and the Asymmetrical Behavior of Selling, General, and Administrative Costs," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(1), pages 252-282, March.
    5. Chen, Yufeng & Xu, Jing, 2023. "Digital transformation and firm cost stickiness: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    6. Daron Acemoglu & Pascual Restrepo, 2018. "The Race between Man and Machine: Implications of Technology for Growth, Factor Shares, and Employment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 108(6), pages 1488-1542, June.
    7. Foster, Benjamin P. & Shastri, Trim, 2016. "Determinants of going concern opinions and audit fees for development stage enterprises," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 68-84.
    8. Banker, Rajiv D. & Basu, Sudipta & Byzalov, Dmitri & Chen, Janice Y.S., 2016. "The confounding effect of cost stickiness on conservatism estimates," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 203-220.
    9. Wulung Li & Ramachandran Natarajan & Yan Zhao & Kenneth Zheng, 2021. "The effect of management control mechanisms through risk-taking incentives on asymmetric cost behavior," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 219-243, January.
    10. James Levinsohn & Amil Petrin, 2003. "Estimating Production Functions Using Inputs to Control for Unobservables," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 70(2), pages 317-341.
    11. Minzhi Wu & Mark Wilson, 2022. "How well do analysts really understand asymmetric cost behaviour?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(3), pages 3951-3985, September.
    12. Zhou, Shuya & Zhou, Peiyan & Ji, Hannah, 2022. "Can digital transformation alleviate corporate tax stickiness: The mediation effect of tax avoidance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    13. Lee, Eunsuh & Kim, Chaehyun & Leach-López, Maria A., 2021. "Banking competition and cost stickiness," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    14. Ercan Oztemel & Samet Gursev, 2020. "Literature review of Industry 4.0 and related technologies," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 127-182, January.
    15. Erin Hartman & F. Daniel Hidalgo, 2018. "An Equivalence Approach to Balance and Placebo Tests," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 62(4), pages 1000-1013, October.
    16. Xavier Brouty & Matthieu Garcin, 2023. "A statistical test of market efficiency based on information theory," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(6), pages 1003-1018, June.
    17. Yue Pan & Qiuping Chen & Pengdong Zhang, 2020. "Does policy uncertainty affect corporate environmental information disclosure: evidence from China," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(5), pages 903-931, June.
    18. Braganza, Ashley & Brooks, Laurence & Nepelski, Daniel & Ali, Maged & Moro, Russ, 2017. "Resource management in big data initiatives: Processes and dynamic capabilities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 328-337.
    19. Xu, Hui & Chan, Kam C. & Na, Chaohong & Fang, Qiaoling, 2023. "The bright side of the internal labor market: Evidence from the labor cost stickiness of firms affiliated with privately owned business groups in China," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    20. Tian, Guangning & Li, Bo & Cheng, Yue, 2022. "Does digital transformation matter for corporate risk-taking?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    21. Rodríguez-Espíndola, Oscar & Chowdhury, Soumyadeb & Dey, Prasanta Kumar & Albores, Pavel & Emrouznejad, Ali, 2022. "Analysis of the adoption of emergent technologies for risk management in the era of digital manufacturing," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    22. Sven Hartlieb, 2023. "Consumer Sentiment, Managerial Expectations and Resource Adjustment Decisions," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(2), pages 481-511, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Yufeng & Xu, Jing, 2023. "Digital transformation and firm cost stickiness: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    2. Liu, Yapan & Jin, Ming, 2023. "Does supply chain network centrality affect firm cost stickiness?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PB).
    3. Davood Askarany & Mona Parsaei & Nilofar Ghanbari, 2024. "Business Strategy, Short-Term Debt, and Cost Stickiness," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 64(3), pages 1913-1936, September.
    4. Thomas R. Loy & Sven Hartlieb, 2018. "Have estimates of cost stickiness changed across listing cohorts?," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 161-181, August.
    5. Li, Tongxia & Lu, Chun, 2022. "Stakeholder orientation and cost stickiness: Evidence from a natural experiment," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 47(PA).
    6. Cristiana Cattaneo & Gaia Bassani, 2020. "Sticky costs: le determinanti e le sfide per manager e accademici," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2020(Suppl. 1), pages 103-126.
    7. Li, Tongxia & Lu, Chun & Chen, Zhihua, 2023. "The unintended consequence of collateral-based financing: Evidence from corporate cost behavior," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(1).
    8. Johnson, E. Scott, 2016. "Do changes in the SG&A ratio provide different information about changes in future earnings, analyst forecast revisions, and stock returns under different circumstances?," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 90-98.
    9. Sven Hartlieb & Thomas R. Loy, 2022. "The impact of cost stickiness on financial reporting: evidence from income smoothing," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(3), pages 3913-3950, September.
    10. Li, Mengzhe & Guo, Siyuan & Wang, Xizi & Liu, Yingqi, 2024. "Increase or decrease: Customer digital transformation and supplier cost stickiness," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    11. Yuwen Cai & Nijat Hajikhanov & Thomas Kaspereit & Anke Müßig, 2024. "Local party committee and labor cost asymmetry," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 371-403, September.
    12. Tingyong Zhong & Fangcheng Sun & Haiyan Zhou & Jeoung Yul Lee, 2020. "Business Strategy, State-Owned Equity and Cost Stickiness: Evidence from Chinese Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, March.
    13. Jason V. Chen & Itay Kama & Reuven Lehavy, 2019. "A contextual analysis of the impact of managerial expectations on asymmetric cost behavior," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 665-693, June.
    14. Zhou, Zhongsheng & Li, Zhuo & Du, Shanzhong & Cao, June, 2024. "Robot adoption and enterprise R&D manipulation: Evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    15. Wang, Xinyi & Zhu, Ling, 2023. "How does export VAT rebates policy affect corporate investment efficiency? Evidence from corporate tax stickiness," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    16. Iny Hwang & Taejin Jung & Woo‐Jong Lee & Daniel G. Yang, 2021. "Asymmetric Inventory Management and the Direction of Sales Changes†," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(1), pages 676-706, March.
    17. Zhang, Ziqi & Su, Zhi & Tong, Fang, 2023. "Does digital transformation restrain corporate financialization? Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    18. Ibrahim, Awad Elsayed Awad & Ali, Hesham & Aboelkheir, Heba, 2022. "Cost stickiness: A systematic literature review of 27 years of research and a future research agenda," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    19. Yu Li & Panpan Feng & Tiange Qi & Jiale Yan & Yongjian Huang, 2024. "Enterprise digital transformation, managerial myopia and cost stickiness," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    20. Xin, Xianyang & Wong, Jin Boon & Hasan, Mostafa Monzur, 2021. "Stakeholder orientation and cost stickiness," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:95:y:2024:i:c:s1059056024004659. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620165 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.