IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reveco/v88y2023icp386-407.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do individuals and institutions make different short selling strategies around the 52-week highs?

Author

Listed:
  • Lin, Mei-Chen
  • Chou, Meng Ping

Abstract

In this study, we investigate whether the effects of the price proximity and timing recency of 52-week highs on short sellers' trading strategies vary with investor type. The results show individual short sellers' interpretations of price increases are influenced by the anchoring bias; thereby leading them to increase their short positions when the stock's price is close to its 52-week high. However, institutional short sellers exploit the underreaction associated with the 52-week high and decrease their short positions. Individual short sellers' biased trading brings losses to investors who mimic this trading strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Lin, Mei-Chen & Chou, Meng Ping, 2023. "Do individuals and institutions make different short selling strategies around the 52-week highs?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 386-407.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:88:y:2023:i:c:p:386-407
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2023.06.028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056023001958
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iref.2023.06.028?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:88:y:2023:i:c:p:386-407. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620165 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.