IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reveco/v88y2023icp1602-1622.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A systematic literature review of blockchain technology and environmental sustainability: Status quo and future research

Author

Listed:
  • Arshad, Ameena
  • Shahzad, Faisal
  • Ur Rehman, Ijaz
  • Sergi, Bruno S.

Abstract

This study conducted a systematic literature review on the function and potential of blockchain technology in promoting environmental sustainability to achieve sustainable development goals (SDG 7 and SDG 13). We chronologically explored theoretical viewpoints, analytical frameworks, measures, relationships, and procedures from 2015 to 2022 to examine the relationship between blockchain technology and environmental sustainability. We followed a four-step methodology (planning, execution, analysis, and reporting) based on Tranfield et al.’s (2003) approach. The extensively preferred PRISMA technique was adopted for conducting a systematic literature review. VOSviewer program was used in this study for bibliometric analysis. The contribution of this study is that this is the first one to use a bibliometric analysis and SLR on the topic of blockchain technology, environment, and green finance from the standpoint of the SDGs, specifically SDG 7 and SDG 13. The findings suggest that to attain environmental sustainability, new approaches are required. New methods to achieve environmental sustainability are possible because of emerging technology like blockchain. Policymakers will benefit from understanding the effect of market interference and the available choices while considering their disruptive consequences. The findings are beneficial for political institutions in establishing the political and legal environment required to develop successful green blockchain applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Arshad, Ameena & Shahzad, Faisal & Ur Rehman, Ijaz & Sergi, Bruno S., 2023. "A systematic literature review of blockchain technology and environmental sustainability: Status quo and future research," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 1602-1622.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:88:y:2023:i:c:p:1602-1622
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2023.07.044
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105905602300254X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iref.2023.07.044?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huang, Lingyu & Zhou, Tingyuan, 2024. "How does blockchain technology enhance firm operation and cooperation?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 34-49.
    2. Erna Farina Mohamed & Azlina Abdullah & Amar Hisham Jaaffar, 2024. "Energy Efficiency in Developing Countries: A Systematic Review of Current Findings and Directions towards a Net Zero Economy," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(5), pages 495-508, September.
    3. Wang, Minxue & Li, Bo & Song, Dongping, 2024. "The impact of blockchain on restricting the misuse of green loans in a capital-constrained supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(3), pages 980-996.
    4. Marsela Thanasi Boçe & Julian Hoxha, 2024. "Blockchain Technology as a Catalyst for Sustainable Development: Exploring Economic, Social, and Environmental Synergies," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 13, March.
    5. Mulligan, Catherine & Morsfield, Suzanne & Cheikosman, Evîn, 2024. "Blockchain for sustainability: A systematic literature review for policy impact," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(2).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:88:y:2023:i:c:p:1602-1622. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620165 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.