IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reveco/v29y2014icp83-96.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

IPO price discovery efficiency under alternative regulatory constraints: Taiwan, Hong Kong and the U.S

Author

Listed:
  • Chang, Hsiu-Hua
  • Chen, Anlin
  • Kao, Lanfeng
  • Wu, Chin-Shun

Abstract

It has been proven by Ljungqvist and Wilhelm (2002) that constraints on underwriters' allocation discretion reduce price revisions. The dual-tranche bookbuilding in Taiwan and Hong Kong imposes more regulations limiting underwriters than U.S. bookbuilding does, but price revisions of Taiwan and Hong Kong IPOs are higher than those of the U.S. This is due not to increased information production but to the primary market inefficiency. Due to the endogenous heterogeneity of price revisions related to underpricing among countries, we use variance ratios to prove that the empirical evidence in Taiwan and Hong Kong is not contradictory to Ljungqvist and Wilhelm (2002).

Suggested Citation

  • Chang, Hsiu-Hua & Chen, Anlin & Kao, Lanfeng & Wu, Chin-Shun, 2014. "IPO price discovery efficiency under alternative regulatory constraints: Taiwan, Hong Kong and the U.S," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 83-96.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:29:y:2014:i:c:p:83-96
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2013.05.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056013000361
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iref.2013.05.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jenkinson, Tim & Morrison, Alan D. & Wilhelm, William Jr., 2006. "Why are European IPOs so rarely priced outside the indicative price range?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(1), pages 185-209, April.
    2. Ljungqvist, Alexander P. & Wilhelm, William Jr., 2002. "IPO allocations: discriminatory or discretionary?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 167-201, August.
    3. Ritter, Jay R, 1984. "The "Hot Issue" Market of 1980," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 57(2), pages 215-240, April.
    4. Carter, Richard B & Manaster, Steven, 1990. "Initial Public Offerings and Underwriter Reputation," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 45(4), pages 1045-1067, September.
    5. Kenji Kutsuna & Janet Kiholm Smith & Richard L. Smith, 2009. "Public Information, IPO Price Formation, and Long‐Run Returns: Japanese Evidence," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 64(1), pages 505-546, February.
    6. Hanley, Kathleen Weiss, 1993. "The underpricing of initial public offerings and the partial adjustment phenomenon," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 231-250, October.
    7. Charles Shi & Kuntara Pukthuanthong & Thomas Walker, 2013. "Does Disclosure Regulation Work? Evidence from International IPO Markets," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 356-387, March.
    8. Benveniste, Lawrence M. & Busaba, Walid Y. & Wilhelm, William Jr., 2002. "Information Externalities and the Role of Underwriters in Primary Equity Markets," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 61-86, January.
    9. Chan, Kam C. & Fung, Hung-Gay & Tay, Nicholas S.P., 2011. "Institutional characteristics and market impediments in Asian capital markets: An introduction," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 365-366, June.
    10. Benveniste, Lawrence M. & Spindt, Paul A., 1989. "How investment bankers determine the offer price and allocation of new issues," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 343-361.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ge, Yuanjing & Guo, Haifeng & Fung, Hung-Gay & Guang, Kuncheng, 2019. "CEO effects on the IPO market under different policy regimes: Evidence from the Chinese SME board," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 163-175.
    2. Mazouz, Khelifa & Mohamed, Abdulkadir & Saadouni, Brahim & Yin, Shuxing, 2017. "Underwriters' allocation with and without discretionary power: Evidence from the Hong Kong IPO market," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 128-137.
    3. Simon Gao & Tony Chieh-Tse Hou, 2019. "An Empirical Examination of IPO Underpricing Between High-technology and Non-high-technology Firms in Taiwan," Journal of Emerging Market Finance, Institute for Financial Management and Research, vol. 18(1), pages 23-51, April.
    4. Wang, Chao-Shi & Tang, Hui-Wen & Chen, Roger C.Y., 2017. "Does IPO subscription demand affect investor herd behavior in Taiwan?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 258-272.
    5. Huang, Hsin-Yi & Chiang, Min-Hsien & Lin, Jia-Hui & Lin, Yun, 2017. "Fixed-price, auction, and bookbuilding IPOs: Empirical evidence in Taiwan," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 11-19.
    6. Pešterac Aleksandra, 2020. "The Importance of Initial Public Offering for Capital Market Development in Developing Countries," Economic Themes, Sciendo, vol. 58(1), pages 97-115, March.
    7. Kao, Lanfeng & Chen, Anlin, 2019. "Partial adjustment of hybrid book-building IPOs with a pre-IPO market," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 292-300.
    8. Chen, Jun & Ke, Bin & Wu, Donghui & Yang, Zhifeng, 2018. "The consequences of shifting the IPO offer pricing power from securities regulators to market participants in weak institutional environments: Evidence from China," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 349-370.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aussenegg, Wolfgang & Pichler, Pegaret & Stomper, Alex, 2006. "IPO Pricing with Bookbuilding and a When-Issued Market," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 41(4), pages 829-862, December.
    2. Alexander Ljungqvist & William J. Wilhelm, 2003. "IPO Pricing in the Dot‐com Bubble," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 58(2), pages 723-752, April.
    3. Michael O'Connor Keefe & David Gallagher, 2014. "Does the effect of revealed private information on initial public offering (IPO) first trading day return differ by IPO market heat?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 54(3), pages 921-964, September.
    4. Patrick M. Corrigan, 2022. "Does an initial public offering (IPO) issuer's Securities and Exchange Commission registration fee calculation method predict pricing revisions and IPO underpricing?," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(4), pages 1114-1147, December.
    5. Pukthuanthong, Kuntara, 2006. "Underwriter learning about unfamiliar firms: Evidence from the history of biotech IPOS," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 366-407, November.
    6. McGuinness, Paul B., 2016. "Voluntary profit forecast disclosures, IPO pricing revisions and after-market earnings drift," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 70-83.
    7. Hoque, Hafiz & Mu, Shaolong, 2023. "Information spillover in Chinese hybrid IPO auctions," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    8. Hanley, Kathleen Weiss & Hoberg, Gerard, 2012. "Litigation risk, strategic disclosure and the underpricing of initial public offerings," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 235-254.
    9. Grammenos, Costas Th. & Papapostolou, Nikos C., 2012. "US shipping initial public offerings: Do prospectus and market information matter?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 276-295.
    10. Kao, Lanfeng & Chen, Anlin, 2019. "Partial adjustment of hybrid book-building IPOs with a pre-IPO market," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 292-300.
    11. Bertoni, Fabio & Giudici, Giancarlo, 2014. "The strategic reallocation of IPO shares," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 211-222.
    12. Jay R. Ritter & Ivo Welch, 2002. "A Review of IPO Activity, Pricing, and Allocations," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 57(4), pages 1795-1828, August.
    13. Roosenboom, Peter, 2012. "Valuing and pricing IPOs," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 1653-1664.
    14. Sherman, Ann E. & Titman, Sheridan, 2002. "Building the IPO order book: underpricing and participation limits with costly information," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 3-29, July.
    15. Agoraki, Maria-Eleni K. & Gounopoulos, Dimitrios & Kouretas, Georgios P., 2022. "U.S. banks’ IPOs and political money contributions," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    16. Oehler, Andreas & Rummer, Marco & Smith, Peter N., 2004. "IPO Pricing and the Relative Importance of Investor Sentiment: Evidence from Germany," Discussion Papers 26, University of Bamberg, Chair of Finance.
    17. Reena Aggarwal & Nagpurnanand R. Prabhala & Manju Puri, 2002. "Institutional Allocation in Initial Public Offerings: Empirical Evidence," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 57(3), pages 1421-1442, June.
    18. Smart, Scott B. & Zutter, Chad J., 2003. "Control as a motivation for underpricing: a comparison of dual and single-class IPOs," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 85-110, July.
    19. Dorsman, André & Gounopoulos, Dimitrios, 2013. "European Sovereign Debt Crisis and the performance of Dutch IPOs," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 308-319.
    20. Josef Schuster, 2003. "The Cross-Section of European IPO Returns," FMG Discussion Papers dp460, Financial Markets Group.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    IPO; Dual-tranche bookbuilding; Allocation discretion; Price discovery efficiency; Underpricing;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading
    • G24 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Investment Banking; Venture Capital; Brokerage
    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:29:y:2014:i:c:p:83-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620165 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.