IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/respol/v54y2025i4s004873332500037x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does patent fee reform lower the bar? Evidence from the deferred patent examination system in Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Kani, Masayo
  • Nishimura, Yoichiro

Abstract

The patent fee system is a substantial policy tool that enables the quality control of patents. In this study, we empirically examine whether the 2011 patent reform in Japan, which reduced the level of patent examination fees, has had a negative effect on the quality of pre-examination patents and post-examination patents. Using a difference-in-differences approach with comprehensive Japanese patent data, we find that even if there has been a negative effect of the 2011 patent reform on the quality of pre-examination patents, its impact has been very limited. In contrast, we find no negative effect of the 2011 patent reform on the quality of post-examination patents. We also find that the negative impact of the 2011 patent reform can be observed only in the lower tail of the patent quality index distribution, not in the upper tail. Thus, we conclude that the detrimental effect of the reform on patent quality in Japan has been negligible.

Suggested Citation

  • Kani, Masayo & Nishimura, Yoichiro, 2025. "Does patent fee reform lower the bar? Evidence from the deferred patent examination system in Japan," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(4).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:respol:v:54:y:2025:i:4:s004873332500037x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2025.105208
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004873332500037X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.respol.2025.105208?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:respol:v:54:y:2025:i:4:s004873332500037x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/respol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.