IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v92y2018icp9-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantitative characterization of carbonaceous and lignocellulosic biomass for anaerobic digestion

Author

Listed:
  • Matheri, Anthony Njuguna
  • Ntuli, Freeman
  • Ngila, Jane Catherine
  • Seodigeng, Tumisang
  • Zvinowanda, Caliphs
  • Njenga, Cecilia Kinuthia

Abstract

Biochemical quantitative characterization of biomass is becoming of key importance with the awareness and implementation of the fourth industrial revolution (FIR) and specifically in waste to energy recovery technologies. In this study, we investigated the quantification, characterization and anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW), sewage sludge, animal manure and agricultural waste as a substrate for potential alternative clean fuel production to meet the ever-rising energy demand. The basis of comparison included ultimate analysis and proximate analysis for better understanding of the characteristic of biomass for waste to energy application. Existing quantitative and characterization methods for physical and chemical properties were analyzed and reviewed using collected samples. The substrates analysis showed physio-chemical properties of significant energy value, like that of natural gas. Biochemical methane potential test (BMP) showed high feasibility for methane production with mono and co-digestion of animal waste, sewage sludge, OFMSW and agriculture waste. The results of the quantitative characterization and BMP test would contribute to affordable, sustainable, reliable, carbon-neutral form of modern energy and development of adequate waste to energy recovery management strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Matheri, Anthony Njuguna & Ntuli, Freeman & Ngila, Jane Catherine & Seodigeng, Tumisang & Zvinowanda, Caliphs & Njenga, Cecilia Kinuthia, 2018. "Quantitative characterization of carbonaceous and lignocellulosic biomass for anaerobic digestion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 9-16.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:92:y:2018:i:c:p:9-16
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.070
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032118302806
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.070?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Toby Green & Opio Innocent Miria & Rolf Crook & Andrew Ross, 2020. "Energy Calculator for Solar Processing of Biomass with Application to Uganda," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Gao, Zhenghui & Alshehri, Khaled & Li, Yuan & Qian, Hang & Sapsford, Devin & Cleall, Peter & Harbottle, Michael, 2022. "Advances in biological techniques for sustainable lignocellulosic waste utilization in biogas production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    3. Zamri, M.F.M.A. & Hasmady, Saiful & Akhiar, Afifi & Ideris, Fazril & Shamsuddin, A.H. & Mofijur, M. & Fattah, I. M. Rizwanul & Mahlia, T.M.I., 2021. "A comprehensive review on anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    4. Cheng, F. & Brewer, C.E., 2021. "Conversion of protein-rich lignocellulosic wastes to bio-energy: Review and recommendations for hydrolysis + fermentation and anaerobic digestion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    5. Garcia, Natalia Herrero & Mattioli, Andrea & Gil, Aida & Frison, Nicola & Battista, Federico & Bolzonella, David, 2019. "Evaluation of the methane potential of different agricultural and food processing substrates for improved biogas production in rural areas," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 1-10.
    6. Raposo, F. & Borja, R. & Ibelli-Bianco, C., 2020. "Predictive regression models for biochemical methane potential tests of biomass samples: Pitfalls and challenges of laboratory measurements," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:92:y:2018:i:c:p:9-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.