IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v212y2025ics1364032125000383.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Novel maturity scoring for hydrogen standards and economy in G20

Author

Listed:
  • Shamoushaki, Moein
  • Koh, S.C. Lenny

Abstract

The absence of a universally accepted hydrogen standard and policy inconsistency hinders the development of a hydrogen economy, trade, and the achievement of net-zero targets across G20 nations. Such regulatory inconsistencies create challenges in policy alignment for investment, infrastructure compatibility, and market forecasting. This study addresses key gaps by performing a comprehensive assessment of hydrogen standards - both local and international - financial allocations, national hydrogen strategies, and future plans for fostering sustainable hydrogen economies within the G20. A maturity scoring approach, employing the Weighted Scoring Model (WSM), is utilized to rank each country from 1 (indicating lowest maturity) to 10 (indicating highest maturity) based on performance across these criteria. Results show that the United States and China, each scoring 10, are the most mature G20 nations in hydrogen economy development, while Mexico scored 1 across all criteria. While only the United States, China, and the United Kingdom have formally released hydrogen standards, countries such as Australia, France, Germany, and Italy demonstrate significant advancements. The review shows that some nations, like Japan (strategy and plan 8, investment 1), have uneven maturity across criteria, with similar patterns in Brazil, South Africa, Russia, Argentina and India. This analysis offers vital guidance for governments and policymakers to advance hydrogen economy policies aligned with global net-zero and sustainability goals. It supports Sustainable Development Goals like Affordable and Clean Energy, Climate Action, and Sustainable Cities and Communities, emphasizing the need for a unified hydrogen standard to drive progress in G20 nations.

Suggested Citation

  • Shamoushaki, Moein & Koh, S.C. Lenny, 2025. "Novel maturity scoring for hydrogen standards and economy in G20," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:212:y:2025:i:c:s1364032125000383
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2025.115365
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125000383
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2025.115365?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Hydrogen standard; Hydrogen economy; Investment; Hydrogen strategy; Maturity scoring; G20;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G20 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:212:y:2025:i:c:s1364032125000383. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.