IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v211y2025ics1364032124010207.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of gains in productivity and water-energy-carbon nexus with tillage, trash retention and fertigation practices in drip irrigated sugarcane

Author

Listed:
  • Wakchaure, G.C.
  • Minhas, P.S.
  • Biswas, A.K.
  • Meena, Kamlesh K.
  • Pradhan, Aliza
  • Gawhale, B.J.
  • Choudhary, R.L.
  • Kumar, Satish
  • Fagodiya, Ram K.
  • Reddy, K. Sammi
  • Pathak, H.

Abstract

Sugarcane is a major contributor to bioenergy production in India and its share is expected to rise further. However, the productivity of sugarcane is not only low, but it is also water-energy-carbon extensive. To work out energy and emission-centric strategies, effects of conservation agriculture-based tillage, surface trash retention, and nutrient management were monitored in drip irrigated sugarcane experiment (2016–22). Six treatments imposed on the plant crop consisted of: three tillage levels viz., CT (conventional tillage i.e. sub-soiling plus cultivating twice followed by rotovator), RT1 (reduced tillage cultivating twice) and RT2 (reduced tillage single cultivation) before preparing ridges for planting in main-plots and two trash management practices viz., M (trash mulching) and NM (non-mulching) in subplots. RT2 and RT1 rather increased plant crop productivity by 13.3 % and 8.2 % over CT, while the increase with M was 5.3, 7.9, and 10.1 %, respectively under CT, RT1 and RT2. The sub-sub plots for the following four ratoon crops included three modes of nutrient management as varied using both a multi-functional (stubble shaving, off-barring, root pruning and band placement of fertilisers) ratoon drill (MRD) for basal dose and fertigation with drippers during crop growth. These consisted of: N1 (25 % recommended fertilisers, RDF as basal and rest through fertigation); N2 (50 % with MRD and 50 % with fertigation) and N3 (75 % with MRD and 25 % with fertigation). RT2+ M + N2 enhanced tillers, cane weight, size matrices, juice quality and produced 45.4 % higher cane yield of ratoon crops compared with CT + NM + N1 (farmers practice). This reduced the yield gap from 38 to 8 % between plant and ratoon crops via its superior water productivity (16.4 kg m−3), partial factor productivity (518.1 kg N kg−1), and reduced water footprint (54.0 l kg−1). The energy consumption during ratoon crops (40.4–50.5 GJ ha−1) was considerably lesser than the plant crop (74.6–87.7 GJ ha−1). Similarly, GHG emissions monitored were 6522–7487 and 9001–10421 kg CO2-eq ha−1 during ratoon and plant crop, respectively. Reduced tillage in ratoons improved energy use efficiency (33.7–56.3 %), net energy (26.3–46.7 %) and reduced GHGs emissions by 3.6–12.9 % compared to CT + NM + N1. This enhanced carbon sequestration by 65.5–73.1 % and reduced carbon footprint by 72–88 %. Thus, integrating reduced tillage, trash retention and appropriate fertigation practices has a potential to improve sugarcane productivity vis-a-vis profitability, and sustain soil and environmental quality in sugarcane production systems, as prevalent in water scarcities regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Wakchaure, G.C. & Minhas, P.S. & Biswas, A.K. & Meena, Kamlesh K. & Pradhan, Aliza & Gawhale, B.J. & Choudhary, R.L. & Kumar, Satish & Fagodiya, Ram K. & Reddy, K. Sammi & Pathak, H., 2025. "Assessment of gains in productivity and water-energy-carbon nexus with tillage, trash retention and fertigation practices in drip irrigated sugarcane," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:211:y:2025:i:c:s1364032124010207
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2024.115294
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124010207
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2024.115294?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:211:y:2025:i:c:s1364032124010207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.