IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v211y2025ics1364032124009419.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How has China's urban compactness affected urban CO2 abatement costs?

Author

Listed:
  • Yin, Kai
  • Yao, Xin

Abstract

While many studies highlight the substantial emissions reduction potential of compact urban structures, their economic implications for carbon abatement are often overlooked. Unlike conventional approaches that focus solely on emissions, the concept of the marginal carbon abatement cost offers a more comprehensive framework, addressing both emissions reduction and broader economic impacts. This research applies a convex quantile regression method to account for factors such as low efficiency, noise interference, and overlooked emission reduction potential, which tend to overestimate the marginal carbon abatement cost. The results indicate that the average urban marginal carbon abatement cost in Chinese cities is 222.47 yuan/ton. This research first measure urban compactness and urban marginal carbon abatement cost across Chinese cities, respectively, and then explore the nexus between them. The findings reveal a statistically significant negative relationship, supported by robustness tests. Mechanism analysis suggests that this impact is driven by technological innovation and industrial structure optimization. The reduction in abatement costs is more pronounced in western cities, medium- and small-sized cities, and cities less dependent on resource-based industries. This study provides insights into compact urban development and offers a new perspective on carbon reduction strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Yin, Kai & Yao, Xin, 2025. "How has China's urban compactness affected urban CO2 abatement costs?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:211:y:2025:i:c:s1364032124009419
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2024.115215
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124009419
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2024.115215?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:211:y:2025:i:c:s1364032124009419. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.