IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v13y2009i9p2485-2494.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A review on reliability assessment for wind power

Author

Listed:
  • Wen, Jiang
  • Zheng, Yan
  • Donghan, Feng

Abstract

The application of wind energy in electric power systems is growing rapidly due to enhanced public concerns to adverse environmental impacts and escalation in energy costs associated with the use of conventional energy sources. Electric power from wind energy is quite different from that of conventional resources. The fundamental difference is that the wind power is intermittent and uncertain. Therefore, it affects the reliability of power system in a different manner from that of the conventional generators. This paper, from available literatures, presents the model of wind farms and the methods of wind speed parameters assessment. Two main categories of methods for evaluating the wind power reliability contribution, i.e., the analytical method and the Monte Carlo simulation method have been reviewed. This paper also summarizes factors affecting the reliability of wind power system, such as wake effect, correlation of output power for different windturbines, effect of windturbine parameters, penetration and environment. An example has been used to illustrate how these factors affect the reliability of wind power system. Finally, mainstream reliability indices for evaluating reliability are introduced. Among these reliability indices, some are recently developed, such as wind generation interrupted energy benefit (WGIEB), wind generation interruption cost benefit (WGICB), Equivalent Capacity Rate (ECR), load carrying capacity benefit ratio (LCCBR).

Suggested Citation

  • Wen, Jiang & Zheng, Yan & Donghan, Feng, 2009. "A review on reliability assessment for wind power," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(9), pages 2485-2494, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:13:y:2009:i:9:p:2485-2494
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364-0321(09)00104-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:13:y:2009:i:9:p:2485-2494. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.