IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v65y2014icp213-218.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simultaneous utilization of galactose and glucose by Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutant strain for ethanol production

Author

Listed:
  • Park, Jeong-Hoon
  • Kim, Sang-Hyoun
  • Park, Hee-Deung
  • Kim, Jun Seok
  • Yoon, Jeong-Jun

Abstract

Red algal biomass is a promising alternative feedstock for bioethanol production, due to several advantages including high carbohydrate content, growth rate, ethanol yield, and CO2 fixation ability. However, it has been known that most yeast strains can not utilize galactose, the major sugar of red algae, as efficiently it can utilize glucose. The authors report a novel ethanogenic strain capable of fermenting galactose, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. This mutant yeast strain exhibited exceptional fermentative performance on galactose and a mixture of galactose and glucose. At 120 g/L of initial galactose concentration, ethanol concentration reached 6.9% (v/v) within 36 h with 88.3% of theoretical ethanol yield (0.51 g ethanol/g galactose). The ethanol concentration and yield were higher than that for glucose at the same initial concentration. In a mixed sugar (galactose + glucose) condition, the existence of glucose retarded galactose utilization however, 120 g/L of the mixed sugar was completely consumed within 60 h at any galactose concentration. The critical inhibitory levels of formic acid, levulinic acid and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (5-HMF) on ethanol fermentation were 0.5, 2.0, and 10.0 g/L; respectively. From this result, the ethanol fermentation efficiency of the novel S. cerevisiae strain using the galactose base of red algae was superior to the fermentation efficiency when using the wild type strain, and the novel strain was found to have resistance to the major inhibitors generated during the saccharification process.

Suggested Citation

  • Park, Jeong-Hoon & Kim, Sang-Hyoun & Park, Hee-Deung & Kim, Jun Seok & Yoon, Jeong-Jun, 2014. "Simultaneous utilization of galactose and glucose by Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutant strain for ethanol production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 213-218.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:65:y:2014:i:c:p:213-218
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2013.09.010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148113004771
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2013.09.010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Packer, Mike, 2009. "Algal capture of carbon dioxide; biomass generation as a tool for greenhouse gas mitigation with reference to New Zealand energy strategy and policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(9), pages 3428-3437, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Battista, Federico & Mancini, Giuseppe & Ruggeri, Bernardo & Fino, Debora, 2016. "Selection of the best pretreatment for hydrogen and bioethanol production from olive oil waste products," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 401-407.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kriegler, Elmar, 2011. "Comment," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 594-596, July.
    2. Avinash, A. & Sasikumar, P. & Pugazhendhi, Arivalagan, 2020. "Analysis of the limiting factors for large scale microalgal cultivation: A promising future for renewable and sustainable biofuel industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    3. Nanda, Sonil & Azargohar, Ramin & Dalai, Ajay K. & Kozinski, Janusz A., 2015. "An assessment on the sustainability of lignocellulosic biomass for biorefining," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 925-941.
    4. Farrelly, Damien J. & Everard, Colm D. & Fagan, Colette C. & McDonnell, Kevin P., 2013. "Carbon sequestration and the role of biological carbon mitigation: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 712-727.
    5. Singh, Anoop & Olsen, Stig Irving, 2011. "A critical review of biochemical conversion, sustainability and life cycle assessment of algal biofuels," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(10), pages 3548-3555.
    6. John J. Milledge & Birthe V. Nielsen & Supattra Maneein & Patricia J. Harvey, 2019. "A Brief Review of Anaerobic Digestion of Algae for Bioenergy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-22, March.
    7. Kächele, Rebecca & Nurkowski, Daniel & Martin, Jacob & Akroyd, Jethro & Kraft, Markus, 2019. "An assessment of the viability of alternatives to biodiesel transport fuels," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    8. Uday Singh & A. Ahluwalia, 2013. "Microalgae: a promising tool for carbon sequestration," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 73-95, January.
    9. Singh, S.P. & Singh, Priyanka, 2014. "Effect of CO2 concentration on algal growth: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 172-179.
    10. Galadima, Ahmad & Muraza, Oki, 2014. "Biodiesel production from algae by using heterogeneous catalysts: A critical review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 72-83.
    11. Merrylin Jayaseelan & Mohamed Usman & Adishkumar Somanathan & Sivashanmugam Palani & Gunasekaran Muniappan & Rajesh Banu Jeyakumar, 2021. "Microalgal Production of Biofuels Integrated with Wastewater Treatment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-13, August.
    12. KS Rajmohan & C Ramya & Sunita Varjani, 2021. "Trends and advances in bioenergy production and sustainable solid waste management," Energy & Environment, , vol. 32(6), pages 1059-1085, September.
    13. Maroua El Ouaer & Nejib Turki & Amjad Kallel & Mansour Halaoui & Ismail Trabelsi & Abdennaceur Hassen, 2020. "Recovery of landfill leachate as culture medium for two microalgae: Chlorella sp. and Scenedesmus sp," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 2651-2671, March.
    14. Sinha, Avik, 2017. "Inequality of renewable energy generation across OECD countries: A note," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 9-14.
    15. Ahmad, Ashfaq & Buang, Azizul & Bhat, A.H., 2016. "Renewable and sustainable bioenergy production from microalgal co-cultivation with palm oil mill effluent (POME): A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 214-234.
    16. Subhadra, Bobban G., 2010. "Sustainability of algal biofuel production using integrated renewable energy park (IREP) and algal biorefinery approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 5892-5901, October.
    17. Ghorbani, Afshin & Rahimpour, Hamid Reza & Ghasemi, Younes & Zoughi, Somayeh & Rahimpour, Mohammad Reza, 2014. "A Review of Carbon Capture and Sequestration in Iran: Microalgal Biofixation Potential in Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 73-100.
    18. Szulczyk, Kenneth R. & Tan, Yeng-May, 2022. "Economic feasibility and sustainability of commercial bioethanol from microalgal biomass: The case of Malaysia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    19. Edeseyi, Margaret E. & Kaita, Aminu Y. & Harun, Razif & Danquah, Michael K. & Acquah, Caleb & Sia, Joseph Kee Ming, 2015. "Rethinking sustainable biofuel marketing to titivate commercial interests," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 781-792.
    20. Douglas Aitken & Blanca Antizar-Ladislao, 2012. "Achieving a Green Solution: Limitations and Focus Points for Sustainable Algal Fuels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(5), pages 1-35, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:65:y:2014:i:c:p:213-218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.