IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v28y2003i12p1851-1864.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is AM1.5 applicable in practice? Modelling eight photovoltaic materials with respect to light intensity and two spectra

Author

Listed:
  • Randall, J.F.
  • Jacot, J.

Abstract

Solar cell comparison is generally based on an arbitrary maximum terrestrial intensity and spectra (of 1 sun, 1000 W/m2) at 25 °C perpendicular to the cell plane [1] referred to by specialists as AM1.5. In practice, no solar cell experiences such conditions, yet few alternative bases for comparison exist [2]. Our interest in this paper is to explore the correct design of indoor Photovoltaic (IPV) products. Given that the indoors, when compared with the outdoors, are characterised by much lower radiant energy intensities, various spectra (including artificial light sources), complete comparison data for indoor conditions are not freely available. More general level reports have been published [3–6].

Suggested Citation

  • Randall, J.F. & Jacot, J., 2003. "Is AM1.5 applicable in practice? Modelling eight photovoltaic materials with respect to light intensity and two spectra," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 28(12), pages 1851-1864.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:28:y:2003:i:12:p:1851-1864
    DOI: 10.1016/S0960-1481(03)00068-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148103000685
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/S0960-1481(03)00068-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yang, Chen & Xue, RuiPu & Li, Xu & Zhang, XiaoQing & Wu, ZhenYu, 2020. "Power performance of solar energy harvesting system under typical indoor light sources," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 836-845.
    2. Lucas Deotti & Ivo Silva Júnior & Leonardo Honório & André Marcato, 2021. "Empirical Models Applied to Distributed Energy Resources—An Analysis in the Light of Regulatory Aspects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-32, January.
    3. de la Parra, I. & Muñoz, M. & Lorenzo, E. & García, M. & Marcos, J. & Martínez-Moreno, F., 2017. "PV performance modelling: A review in the light of quality assurance for large PV plants," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 780-797.
    4. Jakica, Nebojsa, 2018. "State-of-the-art review of solar design tools and methods for assessing daylighting and solar potential for building-integrated photovoltaics," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 1296-1328.
    5. Cannavale, Alessandro & Hörantner, Maximilian & Eperon, Giles E. & Snaith, Henry J. & Fiorito, Francesco & Ayr, Ubaldo & Martellotta, Francesco, 2017. "Building integration of semitransparent perovskite-based solar cells: Energy performance and visual comfort assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 94-107.
    6. Reich, N.H. & van Sark, W.G.J.H.M. & Turkenburg, W.C., 2011. "Charge yield potential of indoor-operated solar cells incorporated into Product Integrated Photovoltaic (PIPV)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 642-647.
    7. Russo, Johnny & Ray, William & Litz, Marc S., 2017. "Low light illumination study on commercially available homojunction photovoltaic cells," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 10-21.
    8. Bertrand, Cédric & Housmans, Caroline & Leloux, Jonathan & Journée, Michel, 2018. "Solar irradiation from the energy production of residential PV systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 306-318.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:28:y:2003:i:12:p:1851-1864. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.