IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v151y2020icp865-886.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic operation of fixed-bed methanation reactors: Yield control by catalyst dilution profile and magnetic induction

Author

Listed:
  • Fache, Axel
  • Marias, Frédéric

Abstract

Dynamic operation of fixed-bed methanation reactors has been subject to increasing research efforts over the past years, as a consequence of its potential interest for the energy transition (power-to-gas). Due to the reaction exothermicity, the thermal management of a reactor is particularly difficult. In the present work, a model and a software are developed to simulate the behavior of a reactor whose reaction medium contains a mixture of catalytic pellets and induction-sensitive pellets. The study shows that a reactor made-up of two reaction zones of different catalytic fractions can produce a gas of identical steady-state compositions for two different flow rates. A steep shift from the low to the high inflow rate generates a transient drop in the methane yield. Magnetic induction rapidly heats up an appropriate portion of the reaction medium, so that the yield remains nearly constant during both transient and steady state after a flow rate shift. This study constitutes a first step towards the final aim of using induction and catalyst dilution profile to stabilize the yield for any flow rate variation in a given range.

Suggested Citation

  • Fache, Axel & Marias, Frédéric, 2020. "Dynamic operation of fixed-bed methanation reactors: Yield control by catalyst dilution profile and magnetic induction," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 865-886.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:151:y:2020:i:c:p:865-886
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.11.081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148119317744
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2019.11.081?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Parra, David & Zhang, Xiaojin & Bauer, Christian & Patel, Martin K., 2017. "An integrated techno-economic and life cycle environmental assessment of power-to-gas systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 440-454.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nico Jurtz & Urvashi Srivastava & Alireza Attari Moghaddam & Matthias Kraume, 2021. "Particle-Resolved Computational Fluid Dynamics as the Basis for Thermal Process Intensification of Fixed-Bed Reactors on Multiple Scales," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-24, May.
    2. Victor Soto & Claudia Ulloa & Ximena Garcia, 2022. "A 3D Transient CFD Simulation of a Multi-Tubular Reactor for Power to Gas Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-21, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Engstam, Linus & Janke, Leandro & Sundberg, Cecilia & Nordberg, Åke, 2025. "Optimising power-to-gas integration with wastewater treatment and biogas: A techno-economic assessment of CO2 and by-product utilisation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 377(PB).
    2. Christoph Sejkora & Johannes Lindorfer & Lisa Kühberger & Thomas Kienberger, 2021. "Interlinking the Renewable Electricity and Gas Sectors: A Techno-Economic Case Study for Austria," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-38, October.
    3. Kim, Dongin & Han, Jeehoon, 2020. "Techno-economic and climate impact analysis of carbon utilization process for methanol production from blast furnace gas over Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalyst," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    4. Yadav, Deepak & Banerjee, Rangan, 2020. "Net energy and carbon footprint analysis of solar hydrogen production from the high-temperature electrolysis process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    5. Jun Dong & Dongxue Wang & Dongran Liu & Palidan Ainiwaer & Linpeng Nie, 2019. "Operation Health Assessment of Power Market Based on Improved Matter-Element Extension Cloud Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-25, October.
    6. Cox, Brian & Bauer, Christian & Mendoza Beltran, Angelica & van Vuuren, Detlef P. & Mutel, Christopher L., 2020. "Life cycle environmental and cost comparison of current and future passenger cars under different energy scenarios," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    7. Lewandowska-Bernat, Anna & Desideri, Umberto, 2018. "Opportunities of power-to-gas technology in different energy systems architectures," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 57-67.
    8. Percebois, Jacques & Pommeret, Stanislas, 2019. "Storage cost induced by a large substitution of nuclear by intermittent renewable energies: The French case," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    9. Lechón, Yolanda & Lago, Carmen & Herrera, Israel & Gamarra, Ana Rosa & Pérula, Alberto, 2023. "Carbon benefits of different energy storage alternative end uses. Application to the Spanish case," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    10. Abdon, Andreas & Zhang, Xiaojin & Parra, David & Patel, Martin K. & Bauer, Christian & Worlitschek, Jörg, 2017. "Techno-economic and environmental assessment of stationary electricity storage technologies for different time scales," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1173-1187.
    11. Kouchachvili, Lia & Entchev, Evgueniy, 2018. "Power to gas and H2/NG blend in SMART energy networks concept," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 456-464.
    12. Bailera, Manuel & Peña, Begoña & Lisbona, Pilar & Romeo, Luis M., 2018. "Decision-making methodology for managing photovoltaic surplus electricity through Power to Gas: Combined heat and power in urban buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 1032-1045.
    13. Inkeri, Eero & Tynjälä, Tero & Karjunen, Hannu, 2021. "Significance of methanation reactor dynamics on the annual efficiency of power-to-gas -system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1113-1126.
    14. Hermesmann, M. & Grübel, K. & Scherotzki, L. & Müller, T.E., 2021. "Promising pathways: The geographic and energetic potential of power-to-x technologies based on regeneratively obtained hydrogen," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    15. Vo, Truc T.Q. & Rajendran, Karthik & Murphy, Jerry D., 2018. "Can power to methane systems be sustainable and can they improve the carbon intensity of renewable methane when used to upgrade biogas produced from grass and slurry?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 1046-1056.
    16. Albert Hiesl & Amela Ajanovic & Reinhard Haas, 2020. "On current and future economics of electricity storage," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 10(6), pages 1176-1192, December.
    17. Zhenya Ji & Zishan Guo & Hao Li & Qi Wang, 2021. "Automated Scheduling Approach under Smart Contract for Remote Wind Farms with Power-to-Gas Systems in Multiple Energy Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.
    18. Dong, Jun & Jeswani, Harish Kumar & Nzihou, Ange & Azapagic, Adisa, 2020. "The environmental cost of recovering energy from municipal solid waste," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    19. Ming, Bo & Liu, Pan & Guo, Shenglian & Zhang, Xiaoqi & Feng, Maoyuan & Wang, Xianxun, 2017. "Optimizing utility-scale photovoltaic power generation for integration into a hydropower reservoir by incorporating long- and short-term operational decisions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 432-445.
    20. He, Liangce & Lu, Zhigang & Zhang, Jiangfeng & Geng, Lijun & Zhao, Hao & Li, Xueping, 2018. "Low-carbon economic dispatch for electricity and natural gas systems considering carbon capture systems and power-to-gas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 357-370.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:151:y:2020:i:c:p:865-886. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.