IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v96y2011i2p332-349.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A probabilistic computational framework for bridge network optimal maintenance scheduling

Author

Listed:
  • Bocchini, Paolo
  • Frangopol, Dan M.

Abstract

This paper presents a probabilistic computational framework for the Pareto optimization of the preventive maintenance applications to bridges of a highway transportation network. The bridge characteristics are represented by their uncertain reliability index profiles. The in/out of service states of the bridges are simulated taking into account their correlation structure. Multi-objective Genetic Algorithms have been chosen as numerical tool for the solution of the optimization problem. The design variables of the optimization are the preventive maintenance schedules of all the bridges of the network. The two conflicting objectives are the minimization of the total present maintenance cost and the maximization of the network performance indicator. The final result is the Pareto front of optimal solutions among which the managers should chose, depending on engineering and economical factors. A numerical example illustrates the application of the proposed approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Bocchini, Paolo & Frangopol, Dan M., 2011. "A probabilistic computational framework for bridge network optimal maintenance scheduling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 332-349.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:96:y:2011:i:2:p:332-349
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2010.09.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832010002048
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2010.09.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andriotis, C.P. & Papakonstantinou, K.G., 2021. "Deep reinforcement learning driven inspection and maintenance planning under incomplete information and constraints," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    2. Tong Wang & Yang Liu & Qiyuan Li & Peng Du & Xiaogong Zheng & Qingfei Gao, 2023. "State-of-the-Art Review of the Resilience of Urban Bridge Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-18, January.
    3. Alaswad, Suzan & Xiang, Yisha, 2017. "A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 54-63.
    4. Iannacone, Leandro & Sharma, Neetesh & Tabandeh, Armin & Gardoni, Paolo, 2022. "Modeling Time-varying Reliability and Resilience of Deteriorating Infrastructure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    5. Andriotis, C.P. & Papakonstantinou, K.G., 2019. "Managing engineering systems with large state and action spaces through deep reinforcement learning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    6. Petchrompo, Sanyapong & Parlikad, Ajith Kumar, 2019. "A review of asset management literature on multi-asset systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 181-201.
    7. Okasha, Nader M. & Frangopol, Dan M. & Orcesi, André D., 2012. "Automated finite element updating using strain data for the lifetime reliability assessment of bridges," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 139-150.
    8. Klerk, Wouter Jan & Kanning, Wim & Kok, Matthijs & Wolfert, Rogier, 2021. "Optimal planning of flood defence system reinforcements using a greedy search algorithm," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    9. Calvert, Gareth & Neves, Luis & Andrews, John & Hamer, Matthew, 2020. "Multi-defect modelling of bridge deterioration using truncated inspection records," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    10. Nogal, M. & Honfi, D., 2019. "Assessment of road traffic resilience assuming stochastic user behaviour," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 72-83.
    11. Fan Zhang & Pingyi Wang & Huaihan Liu & Bin Zhang & Jianle Sun & Jian Li, 2023. "Inland Waterway Infrastructure Maintenance Prediction Model Based on Network-Level Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-17, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:96:y:2011:i:2:p:332-349. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.