IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v95y2010i3p182-194.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of a two-stage inspection process for the assessment of deteriorating infrastructure

Author

Listed:
  • Sheils, Emma
  • O’Connor, Alan
  • Breysse, Denys
  • Schoefs, Franck
  • Yotte, Sylvie

Abstract

Inspection-based maintenance strategies can provide an efficient tool for the management of ageing infrastructure subjected to deterioration. Many of these methods rely on quantitative data from inspections, rather than qualitative and subjective data. The focus of this paper is on the development of an inspection-based decision scheme, incorporating analysis on the effect of the cost and quality of NDT tools to assess the condition of infrastructure elements/networks during their lifetime. For the first time the two aspects of an inspection are considered, i.e. detection and sizing. Since each stage of an inspection is carried out for a distinct purpose, different parameters are used to represent each procedure and both have been incorporated into a maintenance management model. The separation of these procedures allows the interaction between the two inspection techniques to be studied. The inspection for detection process acts as a screening exercise to determine which defects require further inspection for sizing. A decision tool is developed that allows the owner/manager of the infrastructural element/network to choose the most cost-efficient maintenance management plan based on his/her specific requirements.

Suggested Citation

  • Sheils, Emma & O’Connor, Alan & Breysse, Denys & Schoefs, Franck & Yotte, Sylvie, 2010. "Development of a two-stage inspection process for the assessment of deteriorating infrastructure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 182-194.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:95:y:2010:i:3:p:182-194
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2009.09.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832009002282
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2009.09.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Amaya-Gómez, Rafael & Schoefs, Franck & Sánchez-Silva, Mauricio & Muñoz, Felipe & Bastidas-Arteaga, Emilio, 2022. "Matching of corroded defects in onshore pipelines based on In-Line Inspections and Voronoi partitions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    2. Zou, Guang & Kolios, Athanasios, 2022. "Quantifying the value of negative inspection outcomes in fatigue maintenance planning: Cost reduction, risk mitigation and reliability growth," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    3. Zou, Guang & Faber, Michael Havbro & González, Arturo & Banisoleiman, Kian, 2021. "Computing the value of information from periodic testing in holistic decision making under uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    4. Peng, Rui & Liu, Bin & Zhai, Qingqing & Wang, Wenbin, 2019. "Optimal maintenance strategy for systems with two failure modes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 624-632.
    5. Badía, F.G. & Berrade, M.D. & Lee, Hyunju, 2020. "An study of cost effective maintenance policies: Age replacement versus replacement after N minimal repairs," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:95:y:2010:i:3:p:182-194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.