IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v93y2008i2p337-349.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The MDTA-based method for assessing diagnosis failures and their risk impacts in nuclear power plants

Author

Listed:
  • Kim, Jaewhan
  • Jung, Wondea
  • Son, Young Seok

Abstract

In the emergency situations of nuclear power plants (NPPs), a diagnosis of the occurring events along an accident progression or as initiating events is crucial for managing or controlling a plant to a safe and stable condition. If the operators fail to diagnose the occurring event(s), their responses to a given event can eventually become inappropriate or inadequate. This paper presents an analytical method for assessing the potential for a diagnosis failure (or misdiagnosis) and its consequences for human behaviour and plant safety. The method largely comprises of three steps as follows: (1) Analysis of the potential for a diagnosis failure, (2) Identification of the human failure events (HFEs) that might be induced due to a diagnosis failure, and (3) Quantification of the HFEs and their modeling into a PSA model. The paper also presents a pilot application of the proposed method to the small loss of coolant accident of a Korean NPP.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim, Jaewhan & Jung, Wondea & Son, Young Seok, 2008. "The MDTA-based method for assessing diagnosis failures and their risk impacts in nuclear power plants," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(2), pages 337-349.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:93:y:2008:i:2:p:337-349
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2006.10.020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832007000488
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2006.10.020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jae W. Kim & Wondea Jung & Jaejoo Ha, 2004. "AGAPE‐ET: A Methodology for Human Error Analysis of Emergency Tasks," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(5), pages 1261-1277, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. He, Ye & Kuai, Nian-Sheng & Deng, Li-Min & He, Xiong-Yuan, 2021. "A method for assessing Human Error Probability through physiological and psychological factors tests based on CREAM and its applications," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    2. Vaurio, Jussi K., 2009. "Human factors, human reliability and risk assessment in license renewal of a nuclear power plant," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(11), pages 1818-1826.
    3. Németh, E. & Bartha, T. & Fazekas, Cs. & Hangos, K.M., 2009. "Verification of a primary-to-secondary leaking safety procedure in a nuclear power plant using coloured Petri nets," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(5), pages 942-953.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zarei, Esmaeil & Khan, Faisal & Abbassi, Rouzbeh, 2021. "Importance of human reliability in process operation: A critical analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    2. Peter J. Majewicz & Paul Blessner & Bill Olson & Timothy Blackburn, 2020. "Estimating the Probability of Human Error by Incorporating Component Failure Data from User‐Induced Defects in the Development of Complex Electrical Systems," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(1), pages 200-214, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:93:y:2008:i:2:p:337-349. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.