IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v93y2008i1p107-124.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk implications of digital reactor protection system operating experience

Author

Listed:
  • Bickel, John H.

Abstract

This paper summarizes an in-depth review of the US nuclear operating experience with the first generation of digital reactor protection systems. The accumulated operating experience from 1984 to 2006 on these first generation digital reactor protection system functions exceeds 1.27 million hours (∼145.5yr). A review of failure event reports identified 141 specific events associated with these systems on seven US nuclear power plants. Twenty-six of these events involved some type of common cause failure mechanism (predominantly redundant sensors/channels being out of calibration), which temporarily rendered redundant portions of the overall trip function degraded. Most of these failures were found not to be unique to digital systems. Six of the common cause failure events were more severe and involved situations where incorrect addressable constant data sets were systematically loaded into all redundant computer channels due to personnel errors. One of these events involved a latent software design change error introduced during a software update, which would prevent proper operation, given an unlikely event involving failure of three out of four sensors of one type.

Suggested Citation

  • Bickel, John H., 2008. "Risk implications of digital reactor protection system operating experience," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 107-124.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:93:y:2008:i:1:p:107-124
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2006.10.015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095183200600250X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2006.10.015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:93:y:2008:i:1:p:107-124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.