IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v91y2006i10p1266-1280.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of pure and “Latinized†centroidal Voronoi tessellation against various other statistical sampling methods

Author

Listed:
  • Romero, Vicente J.
  • Burkardt, John V.
  • Gunzburger, Max D.
  • Peterson, Janet S.

Abstract

A recently developed centroidal Voronoi tessellation (CVT) sampling method is investigated here to assess its suitability for use in statistical sampling applications. CVT efficiently generates a highly uniform distribution of sample points over arbitrarily shaped M-dimensional parameter spaces. On several 2-D test problems CVT has recently been found to provide exceedingly effective and efficient point distributions for response surface generation. Additionally, for statistical function integration and estimation of response statistics associated with uniformly distributed random-variable inputs (uncorrelated), CVT has been found in initial investigations to provide superior points sets when compared against latin-hypercube and simple-random Monte Carlo methods and Halton and Hammersley quasi-random sequence methods. In this paper, the performance of all these sampling methods and a new variant (“Latinized†CVT) are further compared for non-uniform input distributions. Specifically, given uncorrelated normal inputs in a 2-D test problem, statistical sampling efficiencies are compared for resolving various statistics of response: mean, variance, and exceedence probabilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Romero, Vicente J. & Burkardt, John V. & Gunzburger, Max D. & Peterson, Janet S., 2006. "Comparison of pure and “Latinized†centroidal Voronoi tessellation against various other statistical sampling methods," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(10), pages 1266-1280.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:91:y:2006:i:10:p:1266-1280
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2005.11.023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095183200500236X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2005.11.023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Beachkofski Brian, 2009. "Comparison of descriptive statistics for multidimensional point sets," Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, De Gruyter, vol. 15(3), pages 211-228, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:91:y:2006:i:10:p:1266-1280. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.